• dustojnikhummer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yes because that is more user friendly than running an executable through a built in compatibility layer… suure

          • ReakDuck@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            1 year ago

            Who tf wants usability when shit just has a solution no matter what. Additionally its an old program that a normal person wouldn’t even try.

            On windows shit just doesn’t work and the solutions are most of the time not even existing.

          • riskable@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            If you’re trying to get ancient software to work I think “user friendliness” is the least of your concerns. Especially compared to the alternative (Windows) where the answer is just, “No: That’s not going to work no matter what you do.”