• admiralteal@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Depending on the particular cannon, in some of them the supervision is active at all times. That his senses just let him see all the layers and through all the layers.

    So it’s not just that he CAN see all of them all the time. He doesn’t even have a choice. It would mean nudity to any degree was extremely unremarkable to the man.

    • Vilian@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      also i’m not gonna be aroused in seeing someone naked if i can see that same person without skin or muscle at the same time

      • Exocrinous@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        5 months ago

        That argument doesn’t make sense to me. If you were used to seeing people’s bones your whole life, then bones would be part of your model of an attractive woman.

        “Nice femurs”

        • figjam
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          And you could see deformities and cancer way early.

    • Mac@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      This argument breaks down as soon as you consider that we see clothed people all the time and yet some of them are still attractive.