The U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday threw out the stalking conviction of a Colorado man who sent hundreds of unwanted Facebook messages to a female musician, ruling that state prosecutors had not shown that he was aware of the "threatening nature" of his statements.
  • updawg@kbin.social
    1·
    1 year ago

    No, they declared Colorado’s law is bad. This was a decision written by a liberal woman, joined by the other two liberal justices and four of the conservative ones. They do not have it out for women.

    • iAmTheTot@kbin.social
      3·
      1 year ago

      They essentially said that the messages he sent were covered under the first amendment. Have you read the messages he sent?

      • Arthur_Leywin@kbin.social
        2·
        1 year ago

        Among Counterman’s communications to Whalen were messages that read: “Was that you in the white Jeep?” and “You’re not being good for human relations. Die. Don’t need you.” Others used expletives.

        Counterman, citing mental illness and delusions, argued that his messages were not intended to be threatening and were thus protected speech.

        Not the guy you responded to but god damn… I can’t see that message being interpreted as anything BUT a threat. All I gotta do is declare insanity I guess.

        • iAmTheTot@kbin.social
          1·
          1 year ago

          Those were some of the most tame, to be honest.

          Counterman told two of the women that “people in this position that I’m in right now have been [known] to have gone and killed people. Take nine millimeters and blow their heads off and shit like that. * * * I know where you’re all living.”13 He told another woman that he “ha[d] all your addresses and guess what? You ever heard of a letter bomber? Guess what I’ll be comin at ya with kerosene.”14

          Also

          In March 2011, a grand jury indicted Counterman for violating the federal criminal-threat statute again. 17 This time he was charged with leaving a woman a voicemail saying: “I’m coming back to New York by the way, OK? Maybe this month in March OK. I may be coming back his month or next month. I don’t know which. I’m looking forward to meeting up with you. I will rip your throat out on sight.”18

          Source

          The man had also repeatedly made new accounts to continue messaging women after they blocked him. Multiple times.

    • Jo@readit.buzz
      1·
      1 year ago

      AFAICT they’ve said that Colorada’s law is bad because it does not require intent. Which means they consider any stalker to be innocent as long as they can claim they’ve grown up in a society which never taught them that harassing women is bad. Which all of them can.