• CableMonster@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      21
      ·
      9 months ago

      So a judge did an unjust thing and you want me to accept that as something that as okay?

      Are you guys aware of what his happening right now with trump and all these cases and how its targeted prosecution? I am not even going to vote for him, but its pretty obvious what is happening, and I fear how this will end.

      • Tinidril
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        9 months ago

        Prosecutions generally are targeted at criminals.

        • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          9 months ago

          In corrupt countries does the government ever prosecute people for political reasons?

          • Tinidril
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            Gosh, as a citizen of the United States I just can’t imagine what goes on in a corrupt country. LOL

              • Tinidril
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                9 months ago

                Fraudulent prosecution is a thing, so this particular prosecution is fraudulent. Hmmm, seems like you missed a few steps there.

                Look at the documents case. They bent over backwards to try and get those documents back quietly and let Trump off the hook. If you or I had those documents, we wouldn’t even be given the opportunity to hand them over. We would have SWAT coming through our door, and we would be hauled straight to solitary. A two tiered Justice system exists, but it isn’t what folks like you think.

                That’s the end of my patience for taking you seriously.

                • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  Of all of the things, the document case is the only one that works, the problem is that all the various presidents have been guilty of it, and Hillary did much worse and had nothing done to her.

                  But you need to look at the combination of all of the cases, and how they have half a billion on two bul1shit cases. The problem is the MAGA people are going to be correct that the election was tampered with if trump loses. I am a trump voter, but I can see the dangers.

                  • Tinidril
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    9 months ago

                    There is a big difference between civil and criminal cases. Anyways, the fact that he was found liable in both cases would tend to indicate they weren’t “bullshit”. In fact, they were both absolutely straightforward cases with solid evidence that Trump did exactly what he was accused of.

                    I really, really don’t give a shit what MAGA morons think about anything. Anyone still MAGA at this point is too far gone for me to care.

        • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          9 months ago

          Exactly, you guys want to removed about the orange man, but dont actually want to look at the dangerous things we have going on with the government right now.

          • Psychodelic@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            You should recognize that your message to people here is simply, hey people obviously dumber than me, did you know you’re all dumber than me?

            You’re assuming people that disagree with you know less or don’t know something that you do.

            That’s not how you engage in effective, constructive discourse. You should first seek to understand, then to be understood.

            • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              I dont think they are dumber than me, they are just mislead by the media and dont have the ability to see beyond their own bias. And about this subject I do obviously know more about it than they do.

      • forrgott@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        If each and every one if these cases was not carefully and fully investigated over a course of several years, you might have an argument.

          • forrgott@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            9 months ago

            Lol. Considering even I watched the events in one case happen live? Yeah. Some things are very easy to investigate.

            What’s that got to do with the conversation? You’re not even any good at the what-a-bout-ism thing, dude. Feel free to overthink it so you can come up with another “zinger”; I don’t care, and won’t be responding anyway…

            • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              9 months ago

              They were both obviously political and not well investigated. The one about Ukraine and Zelensky was obviously silly, but you guys dont realize that because you dont listen to good news sources.