HLMenckenFan@lemmy.worldM to politics @lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoThere's no such thing as a conservative intellectual — only apologists for right-wing powerwww.salon.comexternal-linkmessage-square147fedilinkarrow-up1559arrow-down1111cross-posted to: politics@lemmy.world
arrow-up1448arrow-down1external-linkThere's no such thing as a conservative intellectual — only apologists for right-wing powerwww.salon.comHLMenckenFan@lemmy.worldM to politics @lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square147fedilinkcross-posted to: politics@lemmy.world
minus-squareg0nz0li0@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up76arrow-down7·1 year agoIs it hateful, or just critical?
minus-squareRyumast3r@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10arrow-down2·1 year agoHow’s it hateful? At least in a way that modern right wing ideology isn’t?
minus-squareastro_smurf@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up71arrow-down9·1 year agoah, there’s the victimhood the article spoke of
minus-squareRaltoid@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up21arrow-down7·edit-21 year agoYou are aware that scientific studies have shown a clear correlation between conservative thinking and lower cognitive ability?
minus-squareSTUPIDVIPGUY@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6arrow-down2·1 year agoThen try finding a single study that says the opposite.
minus-squareFlying Squid@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down2·1 year agoWhich tobacco studies?
minus-squareFlying Squid@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down1·1 year agoThere’s nothing there about any studies claiming tobacco was good for you. Just finding doctors to say so.
minus-squaresadreality@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down3·1 year agoTobacco industry pkay book is used by big oil, sugar, bad food in general and now tech. Deny until you can’t. Fund fake studies to help your denial arguments. Talk about choice and freedom. Fear monger.
minus-squareFlying Squid@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·1 year agoThat article says they weren’t real studies. We’re talking about real studies here. Things that are peer-reviewed.
minus-squareRhoeri@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up14arrow-down3·1 year agoIt’s hateful? How exactly?
minus-squaretjhart85@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·1 year agoWell I hated it! --Michael Scott Is basically what all the arguments I’ve seen boil down to
minus-squareStrangle@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up15arrow-down49·1 year agoThis type of article is just absolute garbage Fucking salon Jesus Christ
minus-squareRiskable@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·1 year ago Fucking salon Jesus Christ Let’s keep Rule 34 out of this. Thanks!
Removed by mod
Is it hateful, or just critical?
Just hateful.
How’s it hateful? At least in a way that modern right wing ideology isn’t?
ah, there’s the victimhood the article spoke of
You are aware that scientific studies have shown a clear correlation between conservative thinking and lower cognitive ability?
Removed by mod
Then try finding a single study that says the opposite.
Which tobacco studies?
Removed by mod
There’s nothing there about any studies claiming tobacco was good for you. Just finding doctors to say so.
Tobacco industry pkay book is used by big oil, sugar, bad food in general and now tech.
Deny until you can’t. Fund fake studies to help your denial arguments. Talk about choice and freedom. Fear monger.
Removed by mod
That article says they weren’t real studies. We’re talking about real studies here. Things that are peer-reviewed.
It’s hateful? How exactly?
Well I hated it!
--Michael Scott
Is basically what all the arguments I’ve seen boil down to
Poe’s law my dude.
This type of article is just absolute garbage
Fucking salon Jesus Christ
Let’s keep Rule 34 out of this. Thanks!