• dhork@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    9 months ago

    If you need sarcasm punctuation, then you’re not doing it right.

    • gaael@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Not everyone has the same ability to infer from asituation that a sentence is sacastic (especially with written speech). Sarcasm punctuation makes the joke more accessible, which I believe is a good thing.

    • Cethin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      This is not true. Sometimes sarcasm is indistinguishable from a genuinely held belief of someone you’re implying is wrong.

      In spoken language we shift our tone, usually up and down randomly, while being sarcastic, which can be shown by shifting BEtweEEN CapITal anD LowErcASe. This isnt a great solution though, especially typing on mobile. Just like spoken language you can tell if someone is asking a question by the way the sentence is said, we need a marker for written language to tell the reader it’s a question, which is the question mark. If written language didn’t have this issue we wouldn’t need a question mark either. It does have that issue and we do need a question mark and a sarcasm mark.

    • Gabu@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      If you repeat an absurdity in jest often enough, someone will actually believe it as truth. Marking it as sarcasm is a minor moral duty.