• poVoq
    link
    fedilink
    32 years ago

    Speaking of aesthetic values and stylistic choices: you speak way to fast in your video making it hard to follow the finer points and also using what sounds like a whiny teenager voice for quoting other peoples text is a very questionable stylistic choice.

    As for the content of the video itself… I don’t really get the point of nitpicking on details when the very idea of what you are critiquing is to be broadly defined to serve as an entry portal for getting people to re-think their approach to (urban) lifestyle.

    • @Tomat0@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      12 years ago

      The voices weren’t intentional, I just asked for friends to do the voices separately to distinguish from the main thread of the argument, not much I can do if their voices sound a certain way.

      I don’t see how it’s nitpicking when these are worlds meant to be imagined, and part of that involves thinking about/immersing oneself in the worlds. Re-thinking urban lifestyle involves thinking about these aspects.

    • @Tomat0@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      12 years ago

      I have to warn you about the fact that the first time you post here is to post a link to your video :) Oh sorry, is that an issue? I didn’t see any rules on the community so I assumed it was fine.

      What I spent my time analyzing was the worlds themselves, which the imagination of is considered to have an inherently political character to it. Part of calling out those things involves getting an idea of how to identify instances of in art, which is what this video was about.

  • @pizza_is_yum@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    12 years ago

    Legit video, nice job! It was very educational for me, because I’m mostly new to the whole solarpunk aesthetic. I think your critique was fair and well-put.