Can’t have that anymore because of woke

  • GalaxyBrain [they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    4 months ago

    Wot eef there was an app on your mobile that summoned a weasel or a stout of your choice to bite your nippies until they’re all gone? People would have few nippies left on account of they’re always on mobile while standing on queue

  • Misanthrope@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    4 months ago

    Season 1 and 2 + the Xmas Special are solid gold. It was a straight BBC joint then.

    The themes and direction were clear and the show did what it set out to do. I enjoyed that. There are plenty of fair criticisms of the show, but pre-Netflix-collaboration Black Mirror has to stand alone.

  • oregoncom [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    4 months ago

    It always had a weird incel streak to it. I remember the creator something like “yeah I like to portray women being evil because something something maternal instinct”. The episode where the guy’s exwife cheated on him was classic incel bait.

  • GalaxyBrain [they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    4 months ago

    Wot if your mate wrote a transcendental musical thst swept all of britannia and when the queen came to see it, his Xbox came on stage and said it had written the tune? That’d be a real trouser pinch

  • camaron30 [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    It’s amazing how 100% of the first season episodes were about people cheating on their partners. Also how obsessed the author seems to be about women cheating on their partners and having a mixed race baby. Oh yeah, i just remembered the “what if you could become a woman in a videogame and let your mate hit it?” episode.

  • KobaCumTribute [she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    I could never get into Black Mirror because every episode felt like a poorly edited pilot, where the actors weren’t into their roles yet and never would be since it was a one-off and they’d stretch like at most 15 minutes of story out into an hour of not particularly good filler that went on way too long. Like I felt like Love, Death, + Robots and Black Mirror were functionally the same thing and both had about the same amount of story and content per episode, but where LD+R trimmed it a little too tight Black Mirror would just keep going and going without anything there.

    • git [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      4 months ago

      You might find Inside No. 9 a better anthology series to watch. Less “wot if your phone was evil” and more surrealist cross-genre drama. It has a consistent cast and while one or two episodes are weak, overall it’s quite enjoyable.

  • keepcarrot [she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    4 months ago

    Could be good, enjoyed it back in the day, but on reflection its kinda mid. Cyberpunk anthology series could have its day if writers generally understood “its not about how technology makes us bad, but using stories about technology to critique modern society”. Also stop having man main characters where the main tragedy is how the cute girl at the coffee shop won’t date them.

  • Great_Leader_Is_Dead@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    4 months ago

    Wot if, a British bloke made a tele show bout how his dame done cheated on em with a cellular?

    Blimey that’s literally the show you made Charlie innit?

    Oh, right-o

        • Huldra [they/them, it/its]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          4 months ago

          I do not recall any real moment that the premise of the villains is challenged though, the challenge is “you cant be ecofash for moral reasons” and the head ecofash is constantly portrayed as a uniquely troubled genius.

          Is there a potential future where a third season would reveal it to be all bullshit? Sure, but then it becomes bad television instead, since the ecofash narrative is one of the things that was innovative and challenging about it.

      • dead [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        4 months ago

        From what I remember, the ecofash are the villains. The villians has some ecofascist beliefs and are motivated by those beliefs, but I don’t think that the show itself accepts ecofascism. To me it was pretty clear that the show was saying ecofascism is bad.

        • Huldra [they/them, it/its]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 months ago

          It does say that but at the same time as it accepts the core premises and “question” of ecofascism, but it attempts to suggest a different answer for moral reasons.

          Like if there was a show about IQ or something and the message was that you shouldnt oppress people for having lower IQ collectively.

            • Huldra [they/them, it/its]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              There are some parts that are legitimate issues to be concerned with, but the show places a huge emphasis on overpopulation specifically and not very much focus by comparison on matters such as resource allocation, economic systems, shit like that.

              So you get a cabal of rich capitalists that get to essentially unchallenged* present the issue as one of all of humanity at once, and not one that they are directly and constantly perpetrators of. As with the other comment, is there a world where season 3 would critique this? Maybe, but that doesnt seem likely given that the provocative nature of the show is the supposed moral dilemma of population culling vs humanity facing extinction.

              *Unchallenged in that the claims they present are not challenged on a factual basis, nor are the protagonists able to present any opposition in terms of what can be done about the issues but only on matters of morality, and the only protagonist who even has proper knowledge of the same issues is entirely convinced of the antagonists worldview and plan, while those that continue opposing the antagonists legitimately do not have knowledge of the issues.

  • D61 [any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    4 months ago

    Remember the episode about the “Cockroaches”…

    I know people complain about stories when they aren’t subtle but sometimes its nice when you’re beat over the head with the “point” a story was trying to make instead of having to “read the bones” and hope you stumble on a somewhat close answer.