Windows has been a thorn in my side for years. But ever since I started moved to Linux on my Laptop and swapping my professional software to a cross platform alternative, I’ve been dreaming on removing it from my SSD.

And as soon as I finish my last few projects, I can transition. (I want to do it now).

Trouble is which I danced my way across multiple amazing distros, I can’t decide which one to land on since the one software I want to test, Davinci Resolve doesn’t work on my Intel Powered Laptop. (curse you intel implementation of OpenCL).

So the opinions of those of you who’ve used Davinci Resolve, Unity/Godot, and/or FreeCAD. I want it to be stable with minimal down time on hardware with a AMD Ryzen 5 1600x and a RTX 3050. Here’s the OS’s I am looking at.

CentOS (alt Fedora)

  • Pro: Recommended by Davinci Resolve for the OS, has good package manager GUI that separates Applications and System Software (DNF Dragon), Good support for multiple Desktop Environments I like. Game Support is excellent and about a few months behind arch.
  • Con: When I last installed Fedora my OS Drives BTFS file system died a horrific and brutal death, losing all of my data. Can’t have that. And I personally do not like DNF and how slow it makes updating and browsing packages.

Debain (alt Linux Mint DE)

  • Pro: The most stable OS I’ve used, with a wide range of software support both officially in the distros package manager, or from developers own website. I am most familiar with this OS and APT

  • Cons: Ancient packages which may cause issues with Davinci Resolve and Video Games. An over reliance on the terminal to fix simple problems (though this can be said for most linux distros). I personally don’t like APT and how it manages the software.

EndevourOS (alt Manjaro)

  • Pro: The most up to date OS, great for games with the AUR giving support for a lot of software which isn’t available on other distros.

  • Cons: Manjaro has died on me once, and is a hassle to setup right and keep up. EndevourOS has no Package Manager GUI, and is over reliant on the Terminal. Can’t use pacman in a terminal the commands are confusing.

OpenSUSE Tumbleweed

  • Pro: Like Fedora but doesn’t use DNF, good game support

  • Cons: Software isn’t as well supported.

Edit: from the sounds of thing, and the advice from everyone. I think what I’ll do is an install order while testing distros (either in distro box or on a spare ssd) in the following order.

Debain/Mint DE -> OpenSUSE -> EndevourOS -> CentOS

This list is mostly due to stability and support for nvidia drivers.

    • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      8 months ago

      I’ve been scared by Ubuntu. Back in the day (10-20 years ago) it worked well its kind of fallen down. I blame snaps.

    • the16bitgamer@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      8 months ago

      Oh I don’t like Ubuntu, but unlike this community it’s more an in general distaste for the OS than anything specific.

      • Eugenia@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        I think Mint is your best choice. Mint is not Ubuntu, even if the underlying base is based on Ubuntu. It doesn’t have snaps for example, and a lot of the ubuntu fluff and slowness has been cut out. For example, Mint Cinnamon uses 1.2 GB of RAM on a clean boot, but it uses 1.9 GB on Ubuntu-Cinnamon. It’s a cleaner system.

    • neo@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      I used Ubuntu happily for many years and found nothing that suited me better.

      However, with them pushing more and more updates in my face that I can only install if I register an account, I will try to switch to Endeavour on my main system soon.

      • imecth@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        Between the snaps crisis and the ads in the terminal ubuntu seems to be doing its best to scare off regular users.

  • Communist@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Manjaro should not even be considered in the modern distro landscape, the story of manjaro is just a series of incompetent mistakes.

    • the16bitgamer@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      While I have my own personal gripes with it, it’s has one of the most robust GUI configurations I’ve seen in any Linux distos. As someone who doesn’t want downtime having a gui for things like Kernel config and systemd, Manjaro has its perks.

      Doesn’t outweigh breaking my build for touching AUR, but ther is a reason I consider it.

      • Communist@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Sorry, but, no. Pretty much any distro can do all of that perfectly well, the fedoras of the world, the mints of the world, but they don’t break constantly.

        I have given manjaro to 3 people and used it myself for many years, i got sick of it because the team is incredibly incompetent and just breaks things all the time, i’ve switched to arch and all of these problems have gone away.

        let me give you an example of a design flaw that has caused strife for every single person I have given manjaro, how the kernel is handled.

        Manjaro does not let you sudo pacman -S linux, instead, you get linux with the version number as the package, this means for the standard user, your kernel will become outdated, unless you think to go out of your way to update it. This has broken every system of every normal person I have given manjaro at some point, and then i’ve had to go through GREAT lengths to resolve the issue for them, all of which I had to do from a terminal. Updating the kernel should be the default of any sane distro, and I have never encountered another distro that made this such a hassle by default.

        https://github.com/arindas/manjarno

        You can read this for other examples of how incompetent the team is, i’m sorry but there’s just no usecase for manjaro, if you want a GUI, you should simply use something other than arch, like fedora. I see no advantages to manjaro over arch personally, but if you desperately need a GUI, just use something else instead of trying desperately to hack arch into something that it simply is not.

        Manjaro takes the good things about arch, the KISS philosophy, throws that in the trash, adds nothing of value and breaks shit. Endeavoros is the same thing but better in every way, and arch even has an installer now.

        Furthermore, if you’re in need of a GUI, you’re probably going to hate when manjaro finally does break and you’re dropped in a terminal with no experience whatsoever, which will inevitably happen.

    • someonesmall@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      The hate is not justified IMHO. I’ve used Manjaro for 5 years now and never had any problems. It just works.

  • CallOfTheWild@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Don’t pick a distro, pick a desktop environment. Look up KDE Plasma, gnome, cinnamon, xfce, etc. Then pick the largest most stable distro that uses that environment.

    • the16bitgamer@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      8 months ago

      I’ve given this advice in the past too. I’m probably sticking with Cinnamon, which is why Mint is in the options.

      • midnight@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        8 months ago

        Yeah I would say you might as well just go with mint then. Debian based distros are popular for a reason.

        EndeavourOS is really probably the best overall option though, as you have the best software availability, but if you’re not comfortable using the terminal, I might avoid it. (Although I will say that package management with yay is super easy, just yay [packagename] to search and install interactively. Also to update your system just alias yay -Syu to “update” if you have trouble remembering the right flags. I’d really recommend learning to use the terminal regardless of distro, though.)

      • CallOfTheWild@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        8 months ago

        Cinnamon is my favorite so I have mint at home. All the computers at my work have Ubuntu (gnome) and it’s ok but I don’t love it.

        • the16bitgamer@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Gnome (default) has it’s place for someone who doesn’t want a conventional desktop environment or doesn’t like the contemporaries desktop look a likes. But man, I’m 20+ years of using Windows and it’s the way I like my Desktop Environments.

  • excitingburp@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Do not use Manjaro. It is a known trap. What you can do is install pamac, which is what Manjaro uses for GUI package management. It’s been a hot minute since I’ve used Arch, so here’s a tutorial:

    https://itsfoss.com/install-pamac-arch-linux/

    Alternatively you could look at Garuda, which is a solid Arch distro. You’ll either love or hate the theme, but that’s easy to change. It also comes with an interactive kernel by default (most distros use a regular kernel build, which works better for servers).

    Whatever you do, please please please not Ubuntu. It’s the lowest common denominator. Emphasis on “lowest”. It was good in the past, but Canonical have really lost the plot.

      • JoshCodes@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        8 months ago

        Not the above poster but Manjaro routinely pushes out broken packages, has had a number of issues with security (not renewing their tls certificates for their website) and is all around not stable. Arch is a predictable unstable, manjaro is an unpredictable unstable attempt at stable.

        • guywithoutaname@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          8 months ago

          Even if packages weren’t broken, the fact that they make it easy to use the AUR is problematic because the AUR expects the latest packages from the Arch Repos. Often, AUR packages will break on Manjaro for that reason.

        • elfin8er@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          Found this file by user “arindas” on GitHub which seems to highlight a lot of the issues that I’ve been seeing. To summarize:

          Package Management

          Manjaro maintains a separate repository that is not in sync with Arch’s main repositories which means Manjaro is not just Arch. To add to that, even Manjaro wiki states that it is not Arch!

          Source: https://wiki.manjaro.org/index.php?title=Manjaro:_A_Different_Kind_of_Beast

          Manjaro claims to be stable just by delaying packages for a week. This is not an approach a stable distribution would take at all!

          Say that a package in the AUR depends on a library, say libxyz. And libxyz is in the main repos, not in the AUR. The package is updated so that it relies on the new features introduced in libxyz’s version 1.1 however Manjaro delays packages so libxyz is still on 1.0 in Manjaro. If you update the package in Manjaro, it will break because Manjaro holds back packages. So the only way Manjaro can be stable is by literally forking all the Arch related repositories including the AUR and keeping them in sync.

          However it is important to note that often these problems are isolated to single packages and not the system as a whole. Please read #25 (comment) for additional context.

          Security

          The Manjaro system updater used to have a serious security vulnerability [in 2018] which has fortunately been fixed.

          Source: https://lists.manjaro.org/pipermail/manjaro-security/2018-August/000785.html

          This is actually a core package, not an extra or community package. To quote the list,

          I have discovered an issue with one of your core Manjaro packages, manjaro-system 20180716-1 and earlier. The issue allows a local attacker to execute a Denial of Service, Arbitrary Code Execution, and Privilege Escalation attack.

          In an update, password less updates in pamac (Manjaro’s AUR helper) were sneaked in and from the look in the issue made concerning this, the change was made to look like a “feature”. This is a major security issue considering that packages in AUR are not checked by Arch Linux maintainers (and Manjaro does not maintain its own either). Some AUR packages were found to be malware in the past. So think about a casual user (Manjaro’s target demographic are not really power users) installing a harmless-looking AUR package that could potentially mess up their system!

          Source: https://gitlab.manjaro.org/applications/pamac/-/issues/719

          The post also mentioned an issue where the Manjaro updater used bad practices when updating packages such as using the no-confirm flag. This appears to have been fixed from what I can tell.

          Manjaro let their SSL certificates expire not once, not twice, not thrice, but four times! The first time [2015], they asked the users to use a private window and/or change the system time.

          Source: https://web.archive.org/web/20150409095421/https://manjaro.github.io/expired_SSL_certificate/

          Changing the system time could have unintended consequences such as with cron jobs not running at the intended time. It’s also not a best security practice to use an incognito window to bypass the SSL expiry alert. The correct solution is to not let the certificates expire in the first place, which is not difficult and is done by all secure websites.

          The second time when the SSL certificates expired [2016], they did the same.

          Source: https://web.archive.org/web/20160528135123/http://manjaro.github.io/SSL-Certificate-Expired/

          This time the Manjaro developers didn’t recommend changing the system time, but they still recommended creating an exception for the Manjaro website.

          The third SSL certificate expiration was handled a little more sanely [2021].

          Source? https://web.archive.org/web/20220102232338/https://forum.manjaro.org/t/expired-certificate-for-iso-download-on-download-manjaro-org/96441

          The fourth time, HSTS was set but the website was still down [2022].

          Source: https://web.archive.org/web/20221013234550/https://manjarno.snorlax.sh/expiry-2022-08-17.png

          Sending Unexpectedly Large Traffic volume to AUR

          I think some of the dates and sources in this section were wrong, but I did my best to correct them.

          On 2021-04-26, the AUR (Arch User Repository) faced a huge web traffic spike from pamac clients, caused by a bad version of pamac, which is the default Graphical Package Manager for Manjaro

          Source: https://gitlab.manjaro.org/applications/pamac/-/issues/1017

          Manjaro developers have developed thorough technical solutions to mitigate the huge traffic spike from pamac installations [2021-10-02]. They have outlined the steps taken here #25 (comment)

          Source: https://gitlab.manjaro.org/applications/pamac/-/issues/1161

          On 2021-10-14, Pamac was once again blocked by the AUR for shipping another version that flooded the AUR with requests. However the updated version itself was meant to mitigate problems.

          Source: https://gitlab.manjaro.org/applications/pamac/-/issues/1135

          Additional sources: https://www.reddit.com/r/linuxquestions/comments/wqzrpl/did_manjaro_just_forget_to_renew_the_ssl/ https://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/q85t8n/deleted_by_user/

          • JoshCodes@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            Personally, no, i havent used manjaro in years. However, it’s frequently spoken about problem in the community so im sure someone else can help you. Or you could look up people talking about it.

            • someonesmall@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              8 months ago

              I’m asking because I’ve used Manjaro for the last 5 years without problems. I think a lot of arguements against Manjaro here are just based on “that’s what I’ve read somewhere”.

              • JoshCodes@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                8 months ago

                Fair enough. I used to use Manjaro and it broke, cannot remember why. I moved to ubuntu sometime later and I’ve never left. Some would say that makes me a bad linux user, I would say I use an operating system that gets out of my way and let’s me use it. Use whatever tool gets the job done fastest!

  • phanto@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    8 months ago

    I feel like I should throw in a good word for Fedora. I run a combination of dnf and flatpak, and have a grand time, and am doing an IT diploma program aimed very solidly at Windows under Fedora. I’ve used Ubuntu, Mint, and Manjaro, and landed on Fedora for my desktop experience.

      • phanto@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        8 months ago

        I’m no big gamer, but my gaming laptop is a Ryzen with RTX3060, and I dual boot it (Fedora and Windows 10.) I used the rpmfusion Nvidia drivers, no issue, and I get slightly better frame rates and a bit better 3D mark scores in Fedora than Windows. It’s been that way since 37 or 36, I think. Palworld, Monster Hunter World and Rise, Genshin Impact (I know, I know), Borderlands, EDF 5, all work great, along with some retro stuff like City Of Heroes and EQ99. So, I guess I’d like to know why I shouldn’t use Fedora with Nvidia? Also, when you say production machine, do you mean like a server? I’m a student.

        • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Fedora occasionally has issues since its a testing ground for RHEL. That means its going to change things a lot and that’s bad for systems that you use for work as I personally want stability. Nvidia also has a nasty habit of breaking with kernel updates.

          I would’ve mentioned that Fedora takes a solid stance of free software but that’s no longer the case.

      • §ɦṛɛɗɗịɛ ßịⱺ𝔩ⱺɠịᵴŧ@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Fedora’s KDE spin from April forward makes this a nonissue. Plasma 6 makes Wayland and NVIDIA get along like on any other machine. Plus it’s been splendid since Fedora 35 for me.

        Edit: I only use Fedora for work, so not too sure what you mean. I make detailed graphical images which are blown up sizably and have had zero issue. Also never have had a problem sharing with Apple or Windows folks (jah help them).

  • zeluko@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    I mean EndeavorOS can install the same gui package manager as Manjaro has, pamac.
    Game support usually comes from using packages you need and those packages being up to date to support latest changes like fixes.

    Am a long time EndeavourOs user, quite happy, it allows everything i need and pacman never broke on me… cant say the same about apt, when using non-standard repositories (for some up to date packages)
    And the AUR is awesome. Has many packages not found in the normal repositories, just some have to be compiled which can take a bit of time, but i dont have to fiddle with it.

  • gnuplusmatt@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    8 months ago

    I should point out that openSUSE also uses btrfs. I feel I should also point out that that neither it or Fedora has to be installed on btrfs.

    I use Fedora Kinoite myself

  • youmaynotknow@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    8 months ago

    You’ll have the die-hard “XX is the best distros” and the “distros are irrelevant, choose a DE” answers here. The reality is that it will all boil down to your hardware, use case and willingness to tinker, in that same order.

    For example, I love PopOS for laptops with Nvidia cards, only because I am used to the Cosmic version of Gnome PopOS has used all these years (looking forward to the proper Cosmic DE once its out), but for PC (regardless of GPU) I’d rather use Fedora KDE (customized to a Gnome feel) because I find it easy to customize to a very granular degree, and I feel Fedora has the best mix of cutting edge + stability.

    As you can see, there’s a whole lot of “I” in my comment. That’s the beauty of Linux, whatever you end up sticking with, you get to make it as YOURS as you want it to be.

    Arch derived distros require more carefully maintenance than most other base distros (RHEL and Debian), but are also great to actually learn Linux more deeply. RHEL derived distros, IMO, are a better balance between “it just works” and “I can make this happen”, and Debian based are the easiest to maintain, mainly because it tends to be what the most popular distros out there are based on, which makes for a much larger community for when we hit a brick wall (when, not if).

    Bottom line is that I believe you would be better off going the route you mentioned, and going through the pitfalls of each until you find that sweet spot.

    And of course, once you’re on that road, come and ask anything you want, most of us are always happy to help if we can.

    • the16bitgamer@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      8 months ago

      Oh I knew I cast a wide net when I posted here. Wasn’t looking for which distros were best, but rather common pitfalls in this communities zeitgeist, as well as the 1 or two users who actually use the software I am using and any issues that they came across.

      For example Fedora was high on my list of potentials before it was pointed out that it has issues with Nvidia’s drivers. As I am looking for minimal down time/setup it dropped on my list.

      I also heard from someone who is using it on Arch which means I have a fallback if my distros of choice fails.

      • Dumpdog@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        It sounds like you and JJLinux are on the same page. Their advice about hardware, use case, and willingness to tinker is spot on. I might argue that the Davinci Resolve (Studio) use case make these considerations even more important.

        I have been using Davinci Resolve on Linux since DR 15 and know the pain you are going through. Although it looks like you have your solution, I would just like to post what works for me and suggest resources just in case it might help. I know the less painful (to me) route of getting it working in a reasonably reliable fashion.

        These are the distros that currently work for me for use in professional situations:

        Laptop with Intel CPU and Nvidia GPU - Pop OS

        Pros - Can install Pop OS version with working Nvidia drivers, Battery life is generally better (still not good when Nvidia GPU in use)

        Cons - Updates may involve more work (there is probably a better way to update that I haven’t tried) - I used the Daniel Tufvesson method of install originally on Ubuntu and later on Pop OS - https://www.danieltufvesson.com/makeresolvedeb. Not even sure if I’m doing updates in the easiest way. I have just been redoing the process. It might have changed lately.

        The journey with the laptop was dual boot, Ubuntu, Pop. Would not recommend Ubuntu. The usual drivers, audio, and install issues (to be fair I think they are fixed?)

        Desktop with Intel CPU and AMD GPU - Endeavour OS

        Pros - Can install directly from Aur

        Cons - AMD drivers work for everything but DR out of the box. Drivers take some fiddling with AMD but using Archwiki on DR makes it way easier - https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/DaVinci_Resolve. It may not apply to Endeavour but I had conflicts when I installed Blender along side Davinci in Garuda.

        The journey with the desktop was Manjaro (nvidia), Garuda (nvidia and then AMD), to Endeavour. Generally won’t recommend Manjaro - it worked OK for me but required fixing. Garuda worked (Zen Kernel) until Blender install + OS update (dependencies), was always looking at either Garuda (works well with Aur install of DR and games) or Endeavour. Endeavour OS works…it feels less bloated and open to tinkering. It does need a bit more tinkering, but Pamac and research on arch wiki will help a lot.

        There are more pros and cons but these are the ones that helped me to make a choice.

        Sorry for wall of text when you may already have the best solution. I have not tried any of those methods that others have suggested so maybe post how it goes! I definitely would be interested in your experience.

        • the16bitgamer@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 months ago

          Honestly your feedback was what I was looking for. While I could trial and error this myself, I would like to skip the hassle if possible.

          From what it sounds like, while Debain is stable as a OS, but it might be a lot of trouble to install Resolve. Thank you for the link for the makeresolvedeb project, didn’t know this existed, and I find it funny how Black Magic is trying to treat linux like WIndows.

          I was hoping I could avoid Arch, but it does sound like the safest bet for getting it to work.

          I can probably dig around and see if Resolve works well in OpenSuse. But from the lack of Forum and debate around it, I am guessing it’s niche.

          Welp my install order doesn’t change, but I now have a new challenge. Don’t update the live image packages, install resolve, then update the system. If Resolve lives I can keep the distro.

          • Dumpdog@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            8 months ago

            Each way seems like it is difficult but it will work! Determination is the key. It really sucks when you can’t even get the splash screen to work on launch. I had to completely rebuild after Blender dependencies broke DR on Garuda Linux. It was easier to rebuild with Endeavour OS and use all the Arch wiki documentation. I was worried about the driver problems but that was with an AMD GPU and OpenCL drivers. Sometimes you luck out with the hardware you have and it will work right away (I did with the Laptop, Pop OS, Nvidia and makeresolvedeb). It is worth it in the end though! Post an update if you can.

            Daniel Tufvesson…if you are on Lemmy. Thanks for your work.

            And a big FU to Adobe and subscription models.

        • youmaynotknow@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 months ago

          This is why I’ve been spending Kore time in Lemmy than Mastodon. Anyone can provide good help, as long as it needs to be, without worrying about having to split the whole thing.

          You two just gave me the courage I needed to try some Arch based distros again. My experiences with Garuda and Endeavour were hideous, so I never looked back.

          I have an Intel + Nvidia laptop (S76 Gazelle 16), so I’ll do it on that one. My work PC is AMD with integrated graphics, and Fedora 40 KDE has been flawless so far.

          Thank you, for real.

          • Dumpdog@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            8 months ago

            I was hoping your thread would make it to the top of the post. I gave my opinion in your thread because it seemed to be the only one that didn’t run with the usual “Intro to Linux Distros” advice. You gave practical advice that listened to the question. @the16bitgamer@lemmy.world looks to be Linux savvy but just wanting to avoid frustrating pitfalls. So thanks back to you!

            I hope this time around Arch is a better experience. When Garuda breaks it seems to break hard! Endeavour seem easier to fix. I lasted about a month with just the terminal then installed Pamac. One EOS laptop is still terminal only tho.

            • youmaynotknow@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              8 months ago

              Awesome. Then that’s the word. I’m going to go with Endeavour again, this time I’ll do it over the weekend and stick to it for a few weeks even if it breaks. I have to confess that, in both cases, I jumped ship afyer just 3 or 4 attempts to fix broken stuff and those turning into a slight headache, and that’s no way to learn. And, you are falling short by saying that Garuda “breaks hard”, for me it was just frustrating. On Endeavour I recall being able to roll back some of the damage I made by just removing some software I should have read more about before installing, but Garuda is unforgiving 🤣🤣

              • youmaynotknow@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                8 months ago

                Getting ready to make this happen. I know, I said “during the weekend” but I just could not help myself. I may need therapy for my ECDHM (Extreme Case of “DistroHopping” Madness) 🤣

                • Dumpdog@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  Hahaha. This is so awesome… I do the same thing. Just jump in and stay up all night getting it done instead of waiting for the weekend. Definitely do an update!

            • youmaynotknow@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              8 months ago

              Wao, I’d forgotten how easy and straightforward it is to use yay. This is going to be awesome. Thanks again.

  • Shareni@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    8 months ago

    So the opinions of those of you who’ve used Davinci Resolve, Unity/Godot, and/or FreeCAD

    Search for those packages in distro repos, and check if they’re available through some alternative pm like flatpak. If you need them fresh, and there’s no alternative, you can discard centos and debian. If there are, I’d suggest MX (debian).

    An over reliance on the terminal to fix simple problems

    The closer you’re to the bleeding edge, the more you’ll need to use the terminal to fix simple problems. For me, debian and mint never crashed or failed to boot, arch on the hand…

    • the16bitgamer@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      That’s my two cents using mint. Though getting some software like xpadneo required me to build from source.

      • Shareni@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        It’s all tradeoffs. Debian would require you to occasionally follow clear installation instructions or use an additional PM. Arch would let you install it directly, but require you to occasionally debug your system. I’m using MX + Nix, and could install it directly, but setting it up is quite difficult comparatively.

        If xpadneo can work on distrobox, that will probably be the easiest solution overall. The system will be stable, but you can use arch for specific tasks.

  • Ulu-Mulu-no-die@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Debain (alt Linux Mint DE) Pro: The most stable OS I’ve used, with a wide range of software support both officially in the distros package manager, or from developers own website. I am most familiar with this OS and APT Cons: Ancient packages which may cause issues with Davinci Resolve and Video Games

    I don’t use Davinci Resolve but I do play videogames, I build my own desktop for it and I use Linux MX (Debian), it’s rock solid.

    “Ancient packages” are not a problem with backports, there are also flatpacks if some backports are not enough for you, or DEB packages directly from software developers (I manually install a couple of those).

    The only games you will have problems with are those implementing invasive DRM, but that’s not a “Debian” problem, Linux in general doesn’t support that kind of DRM (not yet at least), tho I personally don’t mind since I think DRM is stupid and I’ve always tried to avoid it.

      • Ulu-Mulu-no-die@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Yeah Lutris has fantastic scripts that do everything for you, also the Steam store is really good even if you don’t buy from them, checking that a game is verified for Steam Deck is a guarantee it will work on any other Linux PC.

      • Ulu-Mulu-no-die@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        I didn’t add which GPU I have but I saw you asking in other posts so: currently NVIDIA 4070 with proprietary drivers.

        I’ve been using NVIDIA on my Linux desktop for over a decade, it always worked very well tho you have to install proprietary drivers (opensource ones are not good enough if you use software that requires performance), Linux MX has a script (menu item) to install them, very easy.

        In all this time, only a couple of times I had serious problems with a kernel update (something that can happen with any distro), but Linux MX always keeps boot entries for the last 3 kernels so when it happened I just booted with a previous one and waited a few days for devs to fix it (no tinkering on my part required).

        NVIDIA cards have problems on laptops, those I only buy Intel, but a dedicated card on desktop is good.

  • krdo@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    8 months ago

    Another vote for Debian stable with backports and flatpaks. I don’t really have an issue with outdated software, and I really like “apt”, maybe because I’m so used to it as this point. I’ve been running mainly Debian for 12+ years now.

    My second choice for personal use would be Arch Linux. I had very good experience with it back in the day and their wiki is fantastic. But I’m too comfortable with the simplicity and stability of Debian at this point.

    At work I use Ubuntu because everyone else uses it. It’s not too bad. I just ignore all the crap I don’t like (like snaps).

  • Handles@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    8 months ago

    I had the same apprehensions as you against using a CLI package manager, but I have to say it’s grown on me. I used Debian based OSes for 5-10 years and I swore by Synaptic.

    After only a short while with Endeavour though, I found that I was perfectly happy to run sudo pacman -Ss to search for software — or yay for the AUR. It’s been my daily driver for a couple of years now.

  • Ramin Honary@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    8 months ago

    I would go with Fedora or Mint, both for their software support and stability. Personally I like Mint over Fedora, I think it has a larger selection of software packages but I could be wrong.

    Btrfs is more stable nowadays, I wouldn’t worry about that. And anyway you can choose XFS or Ext4 during installation while setting up your disk partitions.

    If you are worried about a particular software package being too old, try installing FlatPaks instead, or use the Nix or Guix package managers which can co-exist easily with any other package manager.

    • draughtcyclist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      I’m personally using Mint for this exact purpose. It just works and I don’t have to think about it much.

      I love Mint for the simplicity. My only complaint is the lack of Wayland support for cinnamon.

  • kameecoding@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    8 months ago

    Manjaro has also died on me in the past, because they fuck with the packages, EndeavorOs is rock solid and you will thank yourself when you can install stuff like spotify, discord, teamspeak with a single yay command

  • tron
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    8 months ago

    EndevourOS (alt Manjaro) Cons: Manjaro has died on me once, and is a hassle to setup right and keep up. EndevourOS has no Package Manager GUI, and is over reliant on the Terminal. Can’t use pacman in a terminal the commands are confusing.

    I hear this and I highly recommend Bauh. Its a GUI package manager that supports Arch, AUR, Flatpak and Snaps. Will even automatically generate snapshots in Timeshift before you update. Super easy to use. I can’t recommend it enough, I use it on all my desktops.

    • Anarchistcowboy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      Is Buah better than pamac? It’s got to be right? pamac looks great but actually sucks so bad I learned to use Pacman in the terminal.

      • tron
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        I’ve used Pamac, and I did like it but had to move off Manjaro for other reasons. Bauh is leagues better. Pamac is really cluttered UI whereas bauh is just search and install. No frills, pure utility.

    • the16bitgamer@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      I use Bauh on my VM Endeavor install. Compared to using the terminal it’s amazing, but it feels limited. For example I can’t install multiple packages at once it I can with other distro’s gui.