Passed by voters in 1976, the state’s bottle return law for decades prompted high recycling rates, hitting 89% in 2019. Rates dropped during a complete system shutdown at the height of the COVID-19 pandemic and haven’t recovered, falling to 75.6% in 2022.

“This is a real concern…where stores will sell you products, but they will not take them back,” Rep. Tyrone Carter, D-Detroit, said Tuesday during a House Regulatory Reform Committee hearing. “It started with COVID, but now we’ve ballooned to a ridiculous amount of folks that will not take them back.”

Industry statistics indicate that Michigan’s redemption rate exceeds most states with deposit laws, with 70% of cans being returned in California and New York and just 38% in Massachusetts.

Now, see! There’s something positive about ingrained Michigan culture! Three-quarters of us give a rat’s ass and don’t litter the great state of Michigan with cans and bottles!

Jerry Griffin, vice president of government affairs for the Midwest Independent Retailers Association, told lawmakers that consumers may simply be tired of carting bottles and cans to the store, advocating for a one-size-fits-all recycling program encouraging people to put their returnables in the recycling bin. […] “There is a lot of fatigue out there,” Griffin said. “To suggest that that’s only because a certain handful of small business retailers are limiting hours for people to bring things back, I think, is ignoring a larger question at hand.”

Oh, please. Fatigue. That’s like the nine-year-old crabbing about having to make their bed: “Awwww, I’m just gonna sleep in it tonight anywaaaaaay.” Sounds like it’s the retailers that Señor Griffin represents that just don’t feel like keeping up their end of the bargain…

Rep. Julie Rogers, a Kalamazoo Democrat and the bill’s sponsor, said the state needs a statewide standard. […] During spot checks in her district, Rogers said she found retailers who don’t accept returns on Sundays, long-broken machines, limits on total returnables and short time windows for returns.

Most of the people I know are already carting around USD$5 worth of empty cans and bottles rollin’ around in their cars already. Too bad there’s no deposit on fast food packaging, bubble packs or potato chip bags.

  • IMALlama@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Not returning bottles does not equate to not recycling. At $0.10/can it’s just not worth it to me to store the cans and cart them to the store - especially with how few we go through (less than 10/week). We put them in our curbside recycling instead.

    Two things have changed since this law was originally introduced: the prevalence of curbside recycling and inflation. According to the BLS, $0.10 in 1976 is worth over $0.50 today. I would probably revert back to store returns for $5.00/week.

    • raoulraoulOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Not returning bottles does not equate to not recycling.

      Nobody said it does…but

      From the Freep from pre-COVID19 November 29, 2018

      From bottles that are never returned, 75 percent of the paid tax goes to the state’s Cleanup and Redevelopment Trust Fund, while the remaining 25 percent goes to retailers.

      Nevertheless, while I sincerely am happy to hear your family recycles your bottles and cans (as well as consuming trivial amounts of HFCS), you are as the edumacated say outlier with your less-than-two-six-pack-weekly lifestyle. I’m also glad you can afford to literally toss c.USD$4.00 a month in the trash recycling bin. Cheers!

      If you or anyone else reading is interested…