data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7f5be/7f5be6c47972eb68e486951d5fcf63e1bd98a4c3" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/35ee6/35ee6d2fb7e26b33011ef5fdd5dafb9bd51a29a5" alt=""
Can we define “expense”? I consider the loss of public lands extremely expensive. As well as the care and feeding of the carbon based plants required to operate so the base load is maintained. I don’t know numbers, but wouldn’t such an expanse of new solar install demand huge maintenace costs - in areas increasingly prone to natural disaster?
Your first link is from a solar company. Mycle Schneider is a “self-taught anti-nuclear activist”. Cherry picking does make things simple.
But regardless, it’s worth considering the self-fulfilling prophecy. Starting with the state of public discourse leading to tax-incentives heavily favoring solar and wind. And how these articles’ statements exclude all manner of externalities.