ADHD programmer nerd by night, ADHD programmer nerd by day

  • 4 Posts
  • 15 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 21st, 2023

help-circle

  • Kraiden@lemmy.nztoAsklemmy@lemmy.mlWhat is always worth it?
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Trying.

    I know it sounds cliché and… Well… Wanky, but it’s true.

    Trying and failing will always feel better than just giving up.

    Like someone? Say something. They could humilate you and literally kick you in the balls and in 5 years i guarantee you’ll regret it less than if you say nothing. (This is not an excuse to be creepy. If they say NO, then hear the NO. Shit happens. Move on.)

    Have an idea for something cool? Try to make it reality. The sad truth is, honestly it’s probably going to fail, but at least you will be able to say you tried.

    And that 1 fucking time I’m wrong… My god, that 1 time. That’s where the best that life has to offer exists. But first…

    You have to try…

    So ask yourself, really. What’s the worst that could happen? … Aaaand now ask yourself… What’s the best that could happen?












  • The thing that I’ve seen pretty consistently from both RIF and Apollo devs is that they’re not disputing the fact that reddit needs to start making a profit. Nobody’s (seriously) complaining about what was free becoming not free.

    The fact is, if this was purely about money, they’d be willing to negotiate on price. The price they’re asking is ~70x more than imgur, which hosts images WAAAAAY heavier to host than text, and links etc.

    If it was solely about showing ads, they could have given 3PAs access to reddit ads via the api, and enforced showing them.

    There are several ways this could have worked for everyone.

    Reddit wanted to kill 3PAs. That’s the only logical conclusion here. Hell, if they’d come out and said THAT, as well as fixing the problems with their own app first, I might even have been able see their side of it. I would still be pissed, but it’d be more understandable than this very blatant Twitter-esque death-by-pricing thing they’re trying to do.



  • Instead each instance is responsible to create and enforce its own moderation policy. This means that two Lemmy instances can have rules that completely disagree or even contradict. This can lead to problems if they interact with each other, because by default federation is open to any instance that speaks the same protocol. To handle such cases, administrators can choose to block federation with specific instances. To be even safer, they can also choose to be federated only with instances that are allowed explicitly.

    This is really what I’m not quite getting though. I understand (I think) how defederation works at a server (instance) level, but assume I call you a slur here.

    The way that ☝️ is written implies that a moderator from each instance that federates with this one will need to moderate this comment separately… Which seems wasteful