Could have just been injured. Electrocution doesn’t always mean death.
According to Miriam-Webster, the definition of electrocuted is:
to kill or severely injure by electric shock
Could have just been injured. Electrocution doesn’t always mean death.
According to Miriam-Webster, the definition of electrocuted is:
to kill or severely injure by electric shock
I agree with your overall points but wanted to call out that she got hit with a felony and a misdemeanor.
I don’t really know the ins-and-outs of the legal system, but I really hope that felony charge gets reduced or, at a minimum, doesn’t follow her around into adulthood. Would be a shame for her record to be marred like that long-term for a misguided prank pulled when she was 11.
Maybe this phishing definition and background on why that term was coined will resonate better.
From https://www.csoonline.com/article/514515/what-is-phishing-examples-types-and-techniques.html
“Phishing is a type of cyberattack that uses disguised email to trick the recipient into giving up information, downloading malware, or taking some other desired action.”
“… the analogy is of an angler throwing a baited hook out there (the phishing email) and hoping you bite.”
Common phishing schemes involve getting someone to divulge some form of personal information but not all fall into this category. Phishing attempts can involve trying to trick the target into taking some form of action, including making a payment.
It’s probably more accurately described as extortion phishing. With blackmail, I think you actually have to have damaging information that your withholding in return for payment (or other benefit). But this is clearly a non-targeted phishing attack sent to many individuals in the hopes of extorting a payment, without the sender actually having anything damaging on the recipient(s).
Psychedelics have helped me to retain those feelings long after the trip has ended (some indefinitely, at least at time of writing this). I never appreciated a cool breeze until one of those experiences (I always wanted to cover up and shield myself from it before). Now, whenever I feel a cold wind or cool breeze, I appreciate it so much more because of that past experience.
Sly way for the article to be titled. It’s almost as if they’re trying to mask Meta/Facebook being the owner of it.
I’m loving it! There’s definitely a learning curve to the fediverse, but it’s been an enjoyable process and I haven’t felt the need to go back to reddit since switching. All the communities I cared about on reddit either ported over here or have equivalents, and I find the user interactions in comments to be much more level headed and engaging.
Edit: I will add, I have had to supplement some of my news feeds with RSS, but that’s been something I’ve wanted to try for a while. So I’m not particularly disappointed in giving RSS a go.
Can you run dd with the “status=progress” option set to see what’s going on when it stalls? Also, how long until it stalls? In my experience, dd takes a really long time to write over an entire drive of that size, so you may just need to wait it out (could take a couple of days). You can also try increasing the block size (e.g., “bs=8m” or “bs=8M”, with the case of the “m” depending on your OS) and see if that helps to speed things along. Typically, the default dd block size (512 bytes) is pretty slow.
Note: I’m far from an expert but I have been using dd for similar applications as you for a few years. Hopefully something above can be of some help.
Sorry, should have clarified to say anything that ends up being fulfilled by Amazon. If something comes in a reused Amazon box, that’s fine.
I will return anything sent to me in an Amazon package.
I went directly to your site for a reason, which is to avoid Amazon. If you secretly fulfill from Amazon or Amazon Warehouses, I will return the item and shop elsewhere.
Interesting. I never knew that about it’s etymology.
I just looked it up quickly and it seems to be way more nuanced than that. According to at least one article, it was used prior to the first electrical execution in 1899 as a means of referring to a non-fatal shock.
https://www.visualthesaurus.com/cm/wc/electrocution-a-shocking-misuse/
Either way, I think it’s splitting hairs. It’s common and acceptable usage anymore to use that term meaning a non-fatal shock. So the clarification in the title doesn’t come across as redundant to me.