Case after case challenging gun restrictions cites the same Georgetown professor. His seemingly independent work has undisclosed ties to pro-gun interests.
Another example of political groups using money to make whatever conclusion that fits their agenda. Add this to the fact it’s illegal to have government lead or government data for comprehensive gun death studies means we’re all in the dark about the real affect.
Another example of political groups using money to make whatever conclusion that fits their agenda. Add this to the fact it’s illegal to have government lead or government data for comprehensive gun death studies means we’re all in the dark about the real affect.
We’ve got a very good idea because California allows study: gun ownership means you’re a lot more likely to shoot a member of your household than use it in self defense to prevent a killing, as well as much more likely to kill yourself or have a household member kill themlself
Thank you for posting this comment.
_ /\ _