In her first campaign rally as the presumptive Democratic nominee to face Donald Trump, Vice President Kamala Harris took aim at her Republican rival and a widely derided Trump-linked platform that provides a blueprint for the next GOP administration.

“Donald Trump wants to take our country backward,” she said in remarks from Milwaukee on Tuesday, just two days after President Joe Biden ended his re-election campaign and endorsed his vice president.

Harris, who secured enough delegate pledges to clinch the Democratic Party’s nomination within a little over 24 hours after announcing her candidacy, linked Trump to Project 2025, the Heritage Foundation-backed plan for his administration, and one that his campaign is now furiously trying to distance itself from.

“He and his extreme Project 2025 agenda will weaken the middle class. We know we got to take that seriously,” Harris said. ”Can you believe they put that thing in writing? Read it. It’s 900 pages.”

The plan proposes cuts to Social Security and Medicare, tax breaks to corporations that will force “working families to foot the bill” and abolishes the Affordable Care Act, which “will take us back to a time when insurance companies had the power to deny people with preexisting conditions,” Harris said.

  • jimrob4
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    5 months ago

    They either don’t care or ignore it. As long as their side is on top they shrug it off.

    • ImpressiveEssay@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      5 months ago

      But it’s not… Republican side isn’t anyway.

      The only ‘side,’ that wins out of ignoring Jan 6th is people who genuinely want trump to be king.

      • dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        5 months ago

        people who genuinely want trump to be king.

        It is my unscientific and wholly unsubstantiated hunch that some people are okay with that because they have no idea how limited the office of the President is supposed to be, and how that keeps the train on the tracks. They might have thought they were electing a virtual king this entire time.

        • Hemingways_Shotgun@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          5 months ago

          They might have thought they were electing a virtual king this entire time.

          There is no doubt in my mind that when Trump first ran for president in 2016 that’s exactly what he thought he was running for. He had no concept of the actual limitations of the president and thought that it would be carte blanche across the board.

          • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            Nah it’s worse than that.

            You should read about Vance, his and Trump’s mutual friend and sponsor Peter Thiel, and the fucked up thinking of their friend Curtis Yarvin.

            Here’s a good start: https://newrepublic.com/article/183971/jd-vance-weird-terrifying-techno-authoritarian-ideas

            He wrote back in 2012 "If Americans want to change their government, they’re going to have to get over their dictator phobia.”

            That’s just a start. Also remember Thiel gave Trump’s campaign like 1.5M back in 2016, and considered him a “good investment”.

        • GladiusB@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 months ago

          They think they get what they want out of it. They are brainwashed. There is no turning back for some. There is a sunk cost fallacy that you gotta just watch them do it and hope some find their way.

      • SwingingTheLamp
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Lots of people do want a king, or at least, a king in the sense of an embodiment and personification of the nation. Abstract thinking is hard, most of us do it as little as possible, and some people can’t do it at all, so they can’t conceptualize a thing like “the state.” They need a figurehead to relate to, like the king in a monarchical system. When you look at the debate through that lens, it makes sense why they’d not want Biden/their nation to appear weak and disjointed.

        As an aside, I think that combining the head of government and head of state in the office of President is the worst mistake in the Constitution.