• @darthelmet@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    1423 days ago

    Instead, we’re going to elect democrats who won’t do anything for however many decades it takes for the current conservative justices to get old and then, when the time is right, they’ll show their cunning strategy for saving the court: Putting forward a slightly less conservative justice that they won’t even fight for enough to push past republican objections.

    Meanwhile: We’re drowning!

    • @Telorand@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      2523 days ago

      True, but those are our two choices. Status quo or hard Conservative Authoritarianism. There is no third option, no matter how much wishing, whinging, or opining people engage in.

      If we want a third option, we’ll have to start working towards that possibility the very second Biden gets reelected. If Trump wins, then we’re fucked for the next 40 years, at least.

      Also, we have the chance to take back the House and keep the Senate. Republicans may be irrelevant in the decision to choose the next justices, should Biden win. There’s a lot at stake in this next election.

      • @aberrate_junior_beatnik
        link
        English
        1323 days ago

        we’ll have to start working towards that possibility the very second Biden gets reelected

        I’ve been here before. The second Biden gets reelected, the tune will shift from “we’ll have to start working towards that possibility the very second Biden gets reelected” to “we’ll have to start working towards that possibility after the first year of his second term, since that’s the only time Biden can get things done” to “we’ll have to start working towards that possibility the very second democrats win in 2026” ad nauseam. The time for change is now or the time for change is never.

        • AlwaysNowNeverNotMe
          link
          fedilink
          423 days ago

          Our two glorious parties

          A corpofacist theocracy.
          A corporate theocratic controlled opposition party.

        • @Telorand@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          223 days ago

          The time for change is now or the time for change is never.

          Okay. What do you expect you can do in seven months? Because you don’t just have to convince people like you—there’s not enough of you to do anything but throw the election to Trump. You’ll have to convince the leftist Boomers, Gen X, Millennials, and Gen Z who don’t share your particular views that it’s worth doing something drastic and potentially dangerous.

          You’ll have a much better chance of doing that when you have four years of “status quo” than 4+ years of hard right authoritarianism.

          • @aberrate_junior_beatnik
            link
            English
            723 days ago

            You’ll have to convince the leftist Boomers, Gen X, Millennials, and Gen Z who don’t share your particular views that it’s worth doing something drastic and potentially dangerous.

            I mean, yes. That is what I am trying, in a very small way, to do.

            You’ll have a much better chance of doing that when you have four years of “status quo” than 4+ years of hard right authoritarianism.

            I’m not an accelerationist. I have nothing against voting for Biden as harm reduction. And I want to be clear that what I’m about to say is not me advocating for voting for Trump, which I view as a morally reprehensible and disgusting act. But you are just wrong; 4+ years of hard right authoritarianism will likely make those people much more likely to understand that something drastic and potentially dangerous is necessary. Again to be clear: that one good thing doesn’t justify the rest of what will happen under a Trump admin, and people should not vote for him.

            My point is that whatever you think should be done after Biden gets elected, you should just do now, because if you wait, you’ll be waiting forever.

      • @PopOfAfrica@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        1223 days ago

        Yall said we could push Biden further left. The election cycle is such that there is always the next election, and we arent allowed to complain about the candidate, for fear of hurting their chances.

        Its rigged against progressives

        • @njm1314@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          021 days ago

          We did push him left. Anyone with a brain stem who Compares Biden in the 90s to Biden today knows he’s much further left

      • @darthelmet@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        623 days ago

        2 points:

        1. Why is the republican the line for hard core authoritarianism? What the hell do you call it when the government does massive expansions to the military, police, and surveillance state while also designating left wing activists, including climate activists, as domestic terrorists? What about trying to undo the damage caused by the Supreme Court taking away people’s rights? If the republican’s actions were subversions of democracy, then surely it would be justified to take actions outside of normal law to oppose that. But they won’t do that, because at best the democrats are collaborators and more realistically, they’re just the faction of fascists with a better marketing department.

        2. There is a third option: Join up with your fellow workers/citizens/people around the world to work towards something actually productive. Join/organize a union. Sharpen your pitchforks. Destroy some pipelines. Become the domestic terrorist they’ve already labeled you as. That path won’t be any different under a democrat or republican president because both are just as adamant about maintaining the power of the state and capital over people.

        If your plan is to vote for one fascist then wish for the system to reform itself, I have 200+ years of history to show to you.

        • @Telorand@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          -323 days ago
          1. I did not say “hard core authoritarianism.” Go back and reread what I wrote. I said “hard Conservative Authoritarianism.” Biden is authoritarian, and I never said otherwise. Biden is not a Conservative (capital “C”).

          2. Okay. You be the one to start it. Put up or shut up. I’m not interested in this option until I see the ideologues and tankies brave enough to talk about this online doing it in reality. If all you have is, “C’mon bro! We just need to band together,” then it’s not much of a movement. Meanwhile, I plan to hold my nose and vote for Biden, because at least that’s an actionable plan.

          • @darthelmet@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            3
            edit-2
            23 days ago
            • What?

            • One of these things requires effort and involves risk and the other does not. But only one of these things does anything if you end up doing it. Yeah. I’m not doing anything at the moment because I’m depressed, anxious, and don’t really know anyone I live near. I should be doing more, but it’s hard. But you know what I’m not doing? I’m not carrying water for fascists. If you want to talk about harm reduction, for as little as that matters, that inaction is doing less harm than your inaction of telling people to shut up and go tick a box to say they’re ok with fascists.

            EDIT: Perhaps more to the point: There have been and are still people who are doing this work regardless. People in countries that have been colonized or otherwise screwed over by the west put up a fight to try to change that. You aren’t just poo pooing hypothetical direct action that nobody has the courage to do. You’re supporting a government that actively attacks those people who are alrighty fighting for freedom and justice.

            • @Telorand@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              -223 days ago

              And see, that’s where we disagree. I see no evidence that Biden is a fascist (authoritarian ≠ fascist). If you want to convince me he’s a fascist, I’m going to need you to define what a fascist is and how Biden fits that definition.

              • @darthelmet@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                423 days ago

                I don’t see why you feel the need to obsess over definitions. I’ve already given a handful of my objections to the US gov and even some specific things done under the current administration.

                But hey, if you want another one: How about supporting a genocide? Is that fascist enough for you?

                • @Telorand@reddthat.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  023 days ago

                  No. Because “supports genocide” is not an exclusively fascist thing, and that’s why definitions matter. People on the internet love to reduce it to “Guh, Biden is a fascist,” but words have meaning. It’s telling that when asked to define what they think a fascist is, they always deflect. I have never once met someone who can, because they know they are committing a reductio ad absurdum fallacy.

                  Call Biden a fascist all you want, but if you don’t know what those words mean, you’re just making shit up and spouting some bullshit you heard from Political Compass chuds on the internet.

                  • @darthelmet@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    4
                    edit-2
                    23 days ago

                    I’m missing the part where the word matters more than what’s actually happening. If your best defense of Biden is “Well AHKTUALLY! Technically Biden isn’t a fascist because of whatever definition I’m using!” What are we doing here? Just say you don’t care about hurting people. It’ll make things go a lot faster.

                    EDIT: Or if I’m being slightly more charitable: Even if you aren’t ok with hurting people, you view the decision to support current harm being done to people as at worst a neutral act, and possibly even positive since it could be worse. You don’t see how your support for the status quo enables continued once sided violence rather than keeping a fictitious peace.

                    What I’m telling you is that you ARE making a decision and that decision IS for more state and structural violence. But you’re too caught up in the fantasy land that is definitions and respectability politics.

                    I’m deflecting from talking about the definitions? You’re using definitions to deflect from reality. What do you even want? If I copy pasted a definition from Wikipedia or the dictionary would you then be happy and engage with the reality of what’s actually going on? Are you then going to talk about sending weapons to arm a genocide or grossly expanding the surveillance state? Or will you just move on to some other pedantry?

      • seahorse [Ohio]OPMA
        link
        English
        323 days ago

        Why don’t we just start [redacted] the government? Or work on getting a third option right now?

        • @Telorand@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          -123 days ago

          Because it’s too late. What do you think you can achieve in seven months? You’d have to unite leftist Boomers, Gen X, Millennials, and Gen Z and convince them that your plan (third party voting or “industrial action”) is better than the relatively safe option of simply going out and voting for Biden.

          And not only that, but thanks to FPTP, convincing people to join you also means convincing people that it won’t throw the election to Trump, whose party reliably turns out to vote for more Republicans.

          Unless you know something I don’t, we’re about four years too late to build the momentum needed to make dramatic changes.

          • seahorse [Ohio]OPMA
            link
            English
            323 days ago

            You know you can make change outside the official channels, right?

            • @Telorand@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              -223 days ago

              Such as? Do you mean revolt? If that’s what you mean, just say it: you want a revolution. I don’t know why you’re being coy about it.

              But my core point is that you still have to convince everybody else that revolution or civil disobedience are worth losing their security and privilege. You can’t do this alone, and 100,000 people online who share your ideals aren’t anywhere near the same as feet on the ground.

              • seahorse [Ohio]OPMA
                link
                English
                023 days ago

                Lol, I’m not trying to get arrested right now.

                There is plenty of direct action people can take besides a violent revolution to improve their and others circumstances

    • @njm1314@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      021 days ago

      So do you like not know anything about the court? Sotomayor and Kagan? Those two are fucking rock stars. The best legal minds of the last 30 years. The fuck are you even talking about?

      • @darthelmet@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        021 days ago

        Do you not remember the entire fiasco with Obama’s failed attempt at selecting a justice? He picked a “moderate,” the Republicans stonewalled him until the election, and instead of trying to use any of the procedural tricks to push through the appointment that the Republicans would gladly use, the Democrats didn’t put up a fight. Fast forward, Trump wins the election, appoints his justices, and Democrats let it go through.

        If this is an issue where democracy and rights are at stake and if democrats actually gave a crap they wouldn’t be playing by the rules and then accepting the slide into fascism that all this represents.

        But for the elite of the party, none of this shit matters. They aren’t really bound by the same laws as the rest of us. So who cares if the plebs lose some rights? If anything it’s a positive for them. They get to run on being opposed to the bad stuff they let the Republicans do instead of anything positive and they fundraise like crazy over the fear that generates.

        For the Democratic base: They’re just watching a fucking TV show. Politics isn’t a real thing to them. They say they see this slide into fascism, but then the most they’re willing to do about it is go check a box once every 2/4 years and then accept the horrible things that come after because respecting the system is more important than protecting people from it. Maybe the really “radical” ones will go to some march to hold up signs in a spot that’s not gonna bother anyone and then go home after regardless of if that changed anything.

        Meanwhile, their continued uncritical support of the government enables that government to keep working to crush more serious opposition to it.

        • @njm1314@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          0
          edit-2
          21 days ago

          This is just unbelievably myopic and foolish. Yes Merrick Garland was stonewalled. Although considering what an ineffectual and incompetent AG he is I’m not entirely sure that one wasn’t for the best. But as I mentioned Obama got the two greatest justices of Our Generation appointed. And Biden already got Jackson appointed. Claiming that they’ll never get an appointment is silly when they’ve done it three times. So here’s your choice sit there and stew while fascist put in fascist judges or get actual people appointed. You’ve created some kind of fiction for yourself that allows you to sit there and be myopic and ineffectual for no reason. Is it laziness? Just an excuse to avoid having to do anything? I don’t get it.

          • @darthelmet@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            021 days ago

            Did I also miss the part where we got Roe v Wade, etc back? Has this translated into changes to defend our rights? If not, why isn’t more being done? Procedure? Rules? Why should any of that supersede protecting real people? And what about the more direct attacks on our rights coming directly from the administration such as once again expanding the surveillance state?

            As far as my own participation: I’m not doing anything, and that’s distressing, but were this merely a matter of laziness I’d just be voting. It’s not that hard to vote, at least not in my area. I haven’t formed my entire politics around not wanting to drive like <5 minutes to a local poling station once every few years. In 2020 I actually volunteered for 2 different campaigns during the primaries because I still had some fleeting belief that we could change things that way. I don’t know why, I had already learned a lot of the history which informs my lack of faith in the system. But maybe it’s just easier thinking you can change things without the risk of getting shot.

            The liberal’s political responsibilities demand almost nothing of them. Vote from a list of 2 things once in a while, perhaps even less than that if the position isn’t contested or one of the choices is a non-choice. After that, shut up and let others do the thinking and politics for you.

            Anything more than that, which risks running into the apparatus of state violence, is “the wrong way to do things.” We should just be patient, trust our institutions, and continue to believe in the myth of steady progress over time.

            As scary as that is, there are people out there who are brave or desperate enough to be risking their lives to fight the system. I can’t really blame people for being too scared to join in, but I can blame them for insisting that their minimal political participation to support the government that fights against those people is actually a good thing.

            • @njm1314@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              0
              edit-2
              20 days ago

              Oh so now you want to protect Roe versus Wade? By letting conservatives have more justices? That’s your big master plan? The three liberal justices who were the dissenting opinion on the Dobbs decision. An opinion that you clearly didn’t read, nor have you read any dissenting opinion is my guess considering your absolute lack of knowledge about the justices. Sure though continue to fold your arms and pretend like you’re above it when you’re directly allowing it. Arguing for this disengagement when one side is directly trying to take your rights away from you is basically supporting it. Things only get better by winning. Bit by Bit by Bit. But you got to keep winning to do the bit by bit. The show’s got to keep going. The greatest expansion of civil rights in our nation’s history happened during a string of democratic victories.