Less than a month after New York Attorney General Letitia James said she would be willing to seize former Republican President Donald Trumpā€™s assets if he is unable to pay the $464 million required by last monthā€™sĀ judgmentĀ in his civil fraud case, Trumpā€™s lawyers disclosed in court filings Monday that he had failed to secure a bond for the amount.

In the nearly 5,000-page filing, lawyers for TrumpĀ saidĀ it has proven a ā€œpractical impossibilityā€ for Trump to secure a bond from any financial institutions in the state, as ā€œabout 30 surety companiesā€ have refused to accept assets including real estate as collateral and have demanded cash and other liquid assets instead.

To get the institutions to agree to cover that $464 million judgment if Trump loses his appeal and fails to pay the state, he would have to pledge more than $550 million as collateralā€”ā€œa sum he simply does not have,ā€Ā reportedThe New York Times, despite his frequent boasting of his wealth and business prowess.

  • foggy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    7
    Ā·
    8 months ago

    I wonā€™t disagree but, I mean, if Iā€™m a lawyer and I have a law firm, Iā€™d rather split my millions with me and my robots. And I think thereā€™s enough like minded greedy lawyers running law firms to set it in motion.

    • Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      Ā·
      8 months ago

      Except instead of you having to split your revenue with your fellow lawyers and having the work split among hundreds of similar firms, you now donā€™t have to split it, but the available lawyering work is split among everyone who can buy a chunk of compute. Unless you being an actual human lawyer is still advantageous, in which case we wouldnā€™t be at the point where AI is actually replacing lawyers.