• kadu@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    But by that logic, absolutely everything other than standing still in a fethal position in a dark cave is a cyber security risk.

    Are you using an extremely solid version of Linux? Wellllll, sometimes bad actors can push bad code to open source projects! It’s a risk!

    • altec
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      8 months ago

      I mean, it’s true. Network-connected devices are inherently a cyber security risk.

      • kadu@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 months ago

        Yes, which is why that can’t be used as an argument against one specific tool.

        • QuaternionsRock@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          8 months ago

          The benefits massively outweigh the risks when it comes to open source ad blockers (lets be honest, we’re all talking about uBO), but limiting your attack surface is a very widely practiced concept in cubersecurity, and there’s no situation where it is totally without merit.

          • kadu@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            Not using a browser extension but loading JavaScript isn’t limiting your attack surface

            • psivchaz@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              8 months ago

              To be fair, I bet some percentage of those that don’t use an ad blocker ARE using something like no script and just don’t need one as a result.