“Why has no one been charged for disrupting the Supreme Court?”
    • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.worldEnglish
      1·
      10 months ago

      Where do you gather that the court is sympathetic to the argument?

      You’ve admitted they’re illegitimate already. They’re sympathetic to any argument as long as its application yields results Republicans want.

      The justices are literally questioning the other components of the same law which clearly involves more than documents.

      Because they want to limit the scope of the law to documents only. Why would they question the part of the law they want to keep?

        • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.worldEnglish
          11·
          10 months ago

          This thread is now 4 days old, and the comment to which you responded is two days old.

          You are trying to waste my time, and I’m not going to participate in this discussion any longer.