• Melllvar@startrek.website
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    2 months ago

    No, of course it’s not fine.

    But if it’s not fine for domestic social media apps to do it, then it’s even worse for a foreign adversary to do it. Right?

    • jkrtn@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      It is the same worse. Billionaires do not have an allegiance to the well-being of any nation’s citizens. What is a foreign state going to brainwash us with that could possibly be worse than the existing gamer-to-far-right-radical pipeline?

      • Melllvar@startrek.website
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        They could use their advertising platform to manipulate US public opinion and elections. And, again, this isn’t to say it’s fine for domestic companies to do this. But that’s no argument against this law. In fact, I daresay the “gamer-to-far-right-radical pipeline” you identify is an example of this.

        • jkrtn@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          I don’t think I would argue against this law, IDK. It’s just a slap in the face to see they recognize how dangerous the thing is.

          We always knew they would do nothing to legislate misinformation, bigotry, and electioneering on the US-based platforms. But now we know for a fact that they understand these platforms are weaponized against the public.