• grammaticerror@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 years ago

    If not for labor unions we would still be working 12+ hour days. The 8 hour workday and the weekend is all thanks to the courageous efforts of labor advocates.

    • snor10@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      We have so much to be thankfull for to those that came before us. Standing on the shoulders of giants, how easily we forget.

      • explodicle@local106.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        The goverment started recognizing some of these rights after they were won by unions. Then they regulated unions to death, since we’ve got these nice laws now. Then they started rolling back the legal protections.

        And people still have the nerve to say the government is protecting workers rights.

  • Eochaid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 years ago

    Doesn’t stop certain big tech companies from building giant campuses with cafeterias and housing so that employees can literally live, eat, and sleep at work.

    • Dojan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 years ago

      Imagine if they let us work from home instead. I already live, eat, and sleep at work, and it doesn’t cost my company a dime! In fact I pay for all of it!

      • jkure2@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        What if we all just didn’t go in? They gonna fire everyone?

        And they can sell the office too (good luck lmao), we are doing the company a service 😌

        • BotCheese@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          What if we all just didn’t go in? They gonna fire everyone?

          That is called a strike and why they work

        • prole@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          The US, at least, is far too individualistic to effectively do something like this without the people involved being far from unified, and without there immediately being scabs who are more than willing to take their place.

          These people have been so indoctrinated into believing that unions, the very thing that would allow them to effectively do what you suggested, are bad. There is no sense of solidarity in this country.

          • outdated_belated@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            Damn. Thought you were advocating for reformism or some other non-syndicalist approach until I noticed the icon. Do you have a favored approach for building that solidarity?

            Edit: it’s unfair for me to ask this question. A better way of posing it would have been for me to propose a few and to discuss / develop them.

            So, I’d say, I guess organizing outside of the workplace through creating non-hierarchical institutions that meet people’s needs, ie, dual power, is essentially what I’ve arrived at.

            • prole@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              2 years ago

              Honestly, I don’t know how we fix it.

              I’m not sure I would identify myself as a socialist or syndicalist. That said, my politics have been continuously pushed to the left throughout the past 20 years, so you’re probably not too far off.

      • JoumanaKayrouz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        I have to go into the office. I literally do about 1 hour of work a day. I have every capability of doing it at home. It’s crazy.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          My office lets me work from home- half the day. And then I come in and do exactly the same thing I did at home. I like the half day at home, but it makes no sense.

          • BombOmOm@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            2 years ago

            Working from home 2-3 days makes 100% more sense than working from home half of each day. Means you still need to get dressed and do that damn commute every single day.

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              2 years ago

              Neither option makes much sense to me. Especially when I’m doing the same work either way. It makes literally no difference where I do it from.

              And to make it more bizarre, it’s 25 hours at the office and 15 at home. So I do 8-11 at home 4 days a week (not counting lunch) and 8-12 on Friday.

  • paragade@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 years ago

    Dudes wearing Oakley’s and Fox Racing hats would be saying they’re better than you because you don’t work 22 hour days.

    • UltraMagnus0001@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      I don’t understand that culture. You get looked down upon if you say something and when I said we need at least 100k yearly in America, they laugh as it too much for them. We need more confidence as workers to demand more and unions.

        • tabular@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          Minimum wage might not be needed if we instead used universal basic income. Low paying jobs wouldn’t be automatically exploitative since they would still have a minimum income. Perhaps some of those low paying jobs may even bd desireable for certain people over the current minimum wage jobs (e.g. lower or very infrequent hours).

        • cottard@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          It’s almost as if decades of identity politics fed to the uneducated masses is super effective.

          • Fedizen@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            I’ve literally had a relative say shit like “only construction workers need unions” and other nonsense because he just does not understand that for society to function for more than 100 years, you need to be able to tell your boss to fuckoff or do fuckall and get paid for it. I think people assume that wage earners are the latter but like security cams and bullshit metrics and shit have eroded any semblance of humanity from modern workplaces.

            All of this stems from a few areas that keep labor prices down artificially: Agricultural worker exemptions, prisoner exemptions and corporate personhood. You might be like “why the last one” but its the one that says you are functionally equivalent to a corporate charter in the eyes of the government.

            • The last one was specifically to allow corporations to (effectively) vote. We’ve been living with the political results of that since; it’s one reason why the rest of the world laughs when anyone calls Bernie Sanders a leftist extremist.

              • TheFriendlyDickhead@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 years ago

                I hate that everything that is not the opinion of the Republicans is just labelt left and therefore bad. Your politics is just a very weird shit show of two old people screaming at each other that the other one stinks.

  • 😈MedicPig🐷BabySaver😈@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    I did 24hr shifts a minimum of two days per week. Most times I did three days per week with 24hrs of OT. I did that from 2000-2017.

    Now I do simple 4 x 10hr days.

    • DudePluto@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      I feel like people would drink themselves to death more, or at least pass out. Been a few times years ago that sleep was my reason to stop drinking

  • Emerald@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Omg I actually had this same thought the other day and wrote it down.

    I just thought about how cool it would be to not need to sleep. You could have a whole 8-or-so hours to do whatever you want. But then I realized that if we didn’t need to sleep we would likely be required to work longer hours or be otherwise productive during those 8-or-so hours. It’s crazy how arbitrary productivity really is.

  • Bappity@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    if aliens invaded and forced us to work for them they’d probably have better work culture than us

  • deejay4am@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    Literally was a post with a picture of Henry Ford with the caption “this man brought us the M-F 9-5” and someone replied “boooo this man”

    But, even with sleep requirements, Henry Ford reduced it from the norm of 7 days a week, 12-15 hours.

    So I’d imagine that without sleep you’d just never go home.

    • Krzak@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      While it was a change for the better back then, it was a century ago. It’s high time the work week gets reduced again while keeping the wages intact. It’s totally doable.

  • exapsy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    South Korea is closely looking at your thread probably trying to figure out if there’s another way 🥲

  • netvor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    On the other hand, it would feel pretty normal to us.

    Perhaps even our time perception would be probably a bit different. As someone coming from world where bodies require about 8-9 hours of sleep, the perception of time is naturally affected (if not dictated) by having series of waking periods of about the same length every day.

    If there was no such thing as sleep (which might be a bit different than just “not requiring sleep” as you suggest) then we’d just be conscious in one continuous chunk from birth to death. Given what problems our brains solve by sleep (learning, sorting memories / feelings), if the brains were to do these things continuously, the consciousness itself would probably be at least quite a bit different experience.

  • Chefdano3@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    And they’d be mad that the damn dirt Labor union won’t let them have 24 hour shifts.

    And there will be beaten and abused workers agreeing with them because they’ve been convinced that working 24 hr shifts would be better for them.

  • Sylver@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    More job areas would have cafeterias, and I think we would see a lot of 24 hour employees