• Suavevillain@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    6 months ago

    This man does not want to win and he said many times he is a proud Zionist. There is no changing his mind.

      • Hegar@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        25
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        People who don’t realize that both liberals and zionists have a lot of imperialism to be ashamed of remind me of the US education system.

      • slurpyslop@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        “liberal” is significantly less specific in its implications, both in terms of modern day parlance and historical roots, than “zionist”

          • SkyezOpen@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            6 months ago

            Did you ignore the modern parlance part? A zionist is an Israeli nationalist. There’s a bit more to it than “Israel should exist.”

              • SkyezOpen@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                8
                ·
                6 months ago

                And when I say “nick fuentes is a nazi” do you understand what I’m saying, or do you point out that he’s not actually a member of the NSDAP?

                  • SkyezOpen@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    6 months ago

                    To be clear, you don’t agree that nick fuentes is a nazi?

                    2 hours later edit: anyone else find it funny how people with terrible opinions never answer direct questions and prefer to argue semantics?

              • slurpyslop@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                7
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                6 months ago

                doubling down on the stance of not understanding linguistics isn’t the play you seem to think it is

                the wikipedia article on zionism is several thousand words long, and you seem to think it’s possible to accurately boil that down to a one or two sentence dictionary entry

                I’m sure Republicans have many definitions for a liberal.

                it’s more that they don’t have a definition at all

                they use it similarly to “woke”, in that its a nebulous word that takes on any given meaning that they want given the context

                if you tried to distill its myriad of uses into an actual definition you’d get something like “person i disagree with to the point of dislike”, at which point the dumb part becomes making an assertion as utterly vacuous as “i don’t like people i don’t like”

                it’s completely dissimilar

                  • slurpyslop@kbin.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    6 months ago

                    you’re not avoiding excessive detail in a definition due to a limited character space, you’re saying that a word can literally only ever have the precise meaning ascribed to it by the dictionary

                    those are two completely different things and it’s astonishing that you would even try to make an argument that bad after opening this discussion with “i’m sure you can do better than that”

          • Eldritch@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            There shouldn’t be a Jewish state though. It’s a different thing. I don’t think there should be a Christian state or a Muslim state either. Or a Mormon state or a Scientologist state.

            There were Jews living in Palestine before it was carved up and given to the zionists. Why did it need to be turned into a Jewish state to the exclusion of people who have always lived there? At one point they were planning to carve up Argentina and South america. Which still would have been wrong. Though perhaps slightly less insane than what they did.

              • Eldritch@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                6 months ago

                Yeah. There should. It’s always been a bad idea. And historically part of the reason they were persecuted. Not that it justified it. Nor does it justify them doing it in return.

                So you’re saying we should stop resisting and just give the fascists the US as a Christian homeland? Help me understand.

                  • Eldritch@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    6 months ago

                    And they are not treated equal. So you are saying that we should give America to the fascists? I mean after all if the Jewish homeland is 40% Muslim at other 60% is partially Christian as well. So less than 60% of the people in the Jewish homeland are Jewish. But it’s still their homeland somehow? Then Christians with 64% of American population should of course have rights to turn America into their locked down Homeland too.

                    Look I see you post a lot and I generally agree with you. But this is a little too far off the reservation for this indian.