The New York Post have never been a trustworthy publication in the first place, but calling this headline a shameless lie isn’t even a strong enough way to express the new low the American media’s propagandizing has reached, especially in the last few weeks.

To make such an extreme claim up out of thin air is almost unbelievable even by New York Post standards. This is what western media has resorted to in order to keep those with nominally pro-Israeli views invested in this conflict, and we can only expect it to get worse as the diminishing impact of the shock factor continues.

Link to the tweet

  • EstraDoll [she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    60
    ·
    6 months ago

    seems we’ve left the “emphasis” part of “propaganda isn’t about lies, it’s about emphasis” as we move onto the “lies” stage, considering what StopAntisemitism just posted on twitter about the Irish PM recently

  • ryepunk [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    60
    ·
    6 months ago

    The r/worldnews post about this was pretty peak Reddit brain. Frothing at the mouth with demand for Muslims to be genocided across the globe. Never change Reddit.

    I just found it very peculiar that they were complaining about how they had abducted all these female observers, the people who were supposed to be watching Gaza for attacks. Like how did they all get fucking caught? Weren’t they watching? They suck so much that they get their asses captured and then the media is like “they targetted the women!” No they took out the sentries on guard because they’re at war with them. Are they supposed to ignore women soldiers or something?

    Israelis can’t stop screaming about how shitty they are at war now it seems, between the woman trying to blame a ten year old for killing fifty soldiers or how they totally didn’t get owned by Hamas soldiers, they just blew up their own squad with a tank… Failsons running a military.

    • CoolerOpposide [none/use name]@hexbear.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Frothing at the mouth with demand for Muslims to be genocided across the globe.

      Except for China where harmful and dangerous religious extremism is supposed to be tolerated and jobs programs+education are actually ebil CCP plots to eliminate Muslims (Muslims in China have the second highest birthrate of any census group, second only to Tibetans)

    • very_poggers_gay [they/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      6 months ago

      Very surprised that the filth on /r/worldnews, who love to talk about “human shields” in Gaza, have precisely zero questions about israel stationing women on the outskirts of Gaza to send warnings about attacks that the IOF completely ignore

      • Sephitard9001 [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        6 months ago

        They were ignored because the IDF was busy elsewhere and uhh uh uh the duplicitous Gazans sneak attacked them on a holiday!!!

        is what I see in various comment chains

    • MF_COOM [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      58
      ·
      6 months ago

      I went there and it was really weird. Like I’ve heard r/worldnews is a fucked sub but it really felt like all the comments seemed like they were from another planet. Everyone was acting like a) these weren’t soldiers for an occupying army and b) that something especially brutal is being done to them. Like if IDF soldiers aren’t legitimate targets then you’re really giving up the game here.

    • SacredExcrement [any, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      40
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      They’re going to keep baying about all of this until Palestine is gone, then 20 years from now they’ll be talking about how they knew all along that it was fabricated lies.

      Liberals are always on the right side of history once it is politically acceptable.

  • invalidusernamelol [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    6 months ago

    The video is only shocking because there’s blood. Otherwise it just looks like a Prisoner of War situation. They are constantly cutting it and only keeping in shocking images or removing all context from each interaction so it can only have the least charitable interpretation.

    From what I could see, they took the prisoners of war (captured from a military base, which is a legitimate military target) to a FOB, interviewed them with questions about where in Israel they’re from and the phone numbers of their family, then loaded everyone onto transport keeps and likely left the active front to go to a more permanent base/camp.

    No one was killed, no one even got hit or hurt. One person was just yelled at because they kept talking and another just said she had a friend in Gaza and gave them her number.

    • CoolerOpposide [none/use name]@hexbear.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      46
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      هي إل صبايا هي إل همج

      “hay il sabaya hay il hamaj”

      “Sabaya” is essentially referring to them as young female captives of war. So in the context of the video posted, they are referring to the IOF soldiers as literal “Young female prisoners of war.” They also call them “hamaj” which could mean “barbarians” or “savages”

      So what is happening is that Zionists are intentionally misinterpreting their words. The term reached western media a few years ago when Isis was terrorizing the Yazidis, but Isis is notably not Hamas and when Isis used the word they used it to mean young female slaves,

      TW: Sexual assault

      as in property to be used (raped)

      I will attempt an English example of a similar way to misconstrue a word like this. I think the following is a decent approximation on how the meaning of a word can vary drastically given context but not be incorrect to use in any of these contexts:

      “He’s mine for the next 30 minutes.”

      Meaning:

      You will have physical, slave-like ownership over him for the next 30 minutes

      You and him will be sharing time on a task together for the next 30 minutes

      You will have his attention for the next 30 minutes

      You will be alone participating on the same task for the next 30 minutes

      You will be his sole director of activity for the next 30 minutes

      And so on and so on. There are so many ways to interpret the word “mine” in this sentence that the context is extremely important. The fact that the women in the video are called savages/barbarians says pretty much everything it needs to: they are prisoners of war. There’s not necessarily any mention of anything sexual, though somebody acting in bad faith could imply that it was, just like in my example above.

        • CoolerOpposide [none/use name]@hexbear.netOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          6 months ago

          I think that it’s probably better to make jokes like that in small groups of people where you know it will be well received and maybe not make somebody recall bad memories, etc.

          • da_gay_pussy_eatah [she/her]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            6 months ago

            Genuine question, what about that statement is particularly triggering? It’s a pretty common sentiment around here, and I’ve never seen someone ask for a CW or anything.

            • CoolerOpposide [none/use name]@hexbear.netOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              It was a joke about something highly unpleasant for some people, deserving of a content warning at the very least, but more likely it could have had the comment removed or account banned from the site even if they didn’t mean it in a harmful way.

              It has since been edited and I do not think the user meant any harm, but the original comment was definitely out of pocket