If I post nsfw onto a community hosted on lemmynsfw, for example, from the sh.itjust.works account, would that breaking the no pron rule, or not necessarily, since it’s posted on a different instance?

  • tasbir49@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    The potential liability for instance owners due to this is massive. Images should be stored in the instances of the community they’re posted to.

    • 0x4E4F@lemmy.fmhy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Yeah, you’re right… but I think the problem is, the login info… but, than again, how could it store copies of my post, but not images.

      In any case, I do agree that this is something that should be looked into and discussed in length.

      • average650@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t see why the login info is an issue, and storing a copy of a post wirh just a link to an image makes sense.

        • 0x4E4F@lemmy.fmhy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I really have no idea how other instances actually confirm that you’re posting from another instance, not just emulating that you’re a user on another instance. That might be a part of ActivityPub, but I haven’t looked at code, wouldn’t know.

          • your@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            This is part of the ActivityPub protocol, but I haven’t looked into it enough to know how it’s defined.

    • ericjmorey@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s fundamental to the design of Lemmy’s implementation of federation via ActivityPub that all content from an account be hosted on the account’s instance.

      • 0x4E4F@lemmy.fmhy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        If it’s an ActivityPub feature, this is somewhat of a poor design if you ask me (or at least not being able to change this). He’s right, this feature could put instance owners in legal problems, because the data in question is actually stored on their server, not the server that you posted the image on.