I feel like this might be something to prevent infamy from being spread to someone with a similar name, but also because having three names can also make “naming” them feel more serious. Like when you are a kid and you are in trouble with your mom and they use your full name to establish how you are in a lot of trouble instead of just a little trouble.
I feel like this might be something to prevent infamy from being spread to someone with a similar name
It’s almost always this, serial killers usually get the same treatment. I think it was especially more important in years past when a full name was more often used to identify a person
Jerry: But lone gunmen assassins, they always have three names. John Wilkes Booth, Lee Harvey Oswald, Mark David Chapman…
Alice : John Hinckley. He shot Reagan. He only has two names.
Jerry : Yeah, but he only just shot Reagan. Reagan didn’t die. If Reagan had died, I’m pretty sure we probably would all know what John Hinckley’s middle name was.
One thing everyone can agree on: You MUST use 3 names when addressing an assassin.
It’s the weirdest thing! I’ve been saying this for years.
I feel like this might be something to prevent infamy from being spread to someone with a similar name, but also because having three names can also make “naming” them feel more serious. Like when you are a kid and you are in trouble with your mom and they use your full name to establish how you are in a lot of trouble instead of just a little trouble.
It’s almost always this, serial killers usually get the same treatment. I think it was especially more important in years past when a full name was more often used to identify a person
Abe’s assassin only has two names so I propose we address him as “Sir Tetsuya Yamagami”.
Tommy “Terrible Shot” Crooks