U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken said the United States has ‘serious concerns’ about the announced result of Venezuela’s hotly contested presidential election that authorities say was won by incumbent Nicolas Maduro.

Speaking in Tokyo on Monday shortly after the announcement was made, Blinken said the U.S. was concerned that the result reflected neither the will nor the votes of the Venezuelan people. He called for election officials to publish the full results transparently and immediately and said the U.S. and the international community would respond accordingly.

  • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    ITT: Tankies being apologists for an equally corrupt regime who obviously rigged an election.

    I also rolled my eyes when I saw the headline. US don’t really have much of credibility on this one. But tankie wankers think the election result is perfectly okay simply because “suck it 'Murica”.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        It’s more that we’ve got a long history of Sec of States going on record saying things that are categorically untrue. Could ABC News find us a slightly more trustworthy source? Perhaps an unnamed Iraq informant code-named Curveball? Or an FBI informant with Neo-Nazi ties looking to rat on a civil rights icon? Bill Clinton talking about a blowjob? Literally anyone more trustworthy.

    • archomrade [he/him]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      3 months ago

      US don’t really have much of credibility on this one.

      fuckin’… Yea, that’s the point

      The US doesn’t dispute foreign election results unless it benefits them; their complaint is essentially unrelated to the actual legitimacy of the results.

      Venezuela has been a target of US diplomatic aggression since they nationalized their oil. Say whatever you want about their government but their history has been fucked beyond recognition by US diplomatic intervention. That Blinken is wasting air commenting on it is simply more evidence of the US weighing in on affairs they ought to have fuck-all to do with.

      • Samueru@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Venezuela has been a target of US diplomatic aggression since they nationalized their oil.

        Since 1976? Venezuela’s oil was nationalized by Rafael Caldera in that year.

        And yes that Rafael Caldera, the guy Chavez tried to overthrow lmao.

        • archomrade [he/him]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Yes, it may be surprising that US relations with Venezuela began before Chavez, but it’s true

      • DragonTypeWyvern
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        If the American government wants me to doubt the integrity of their election they should have kept their mouths shut and let the evidence speak for itself.

        We know they were suppressing the opposition, and by definition that means the election wasn’t free and fair. You want to do anything else? Find some proof and publish that.