• overcast5348@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Edit: I’m wrong, ignore the rest of my comment. Leaving it around for the world to see my shame.

        An enclave is one country’s land that’s completely surrounded by another country’s land.

        The land border between Canada and Denmark is on an island, and each country “owns” half the island. There’s no enclave involved here.

      • BarqsHasBite@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Had to think about this but I don’t think an island is considered an exclave.

        The reason for this is because it is entirely surrounded by water, not another piece of land. Islands are not usually considered to be exclaves.

        https://homework.study.com/explanation/is-hawaii-an-exclave.html it’s paywalled but the answer came through on google.

        The island is right beside both Canadian and Denmark (greenland) land, so it’s not exactly isolated or surrounded by either.

            • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              Oh shit, yeah, I forget it’s considered an island.

              I see Indonesia borders Papua on that map, and that’s the same situation. Plus, Greenland isn’t treated separately from Denmark, which would be the other possibility.

              Maybe they don’t have data on it? /s

      • jol@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        It’s totally arbitrary for the purposes of making the map look better. Otherwise Indonesia wouldn’t be on the continent.

  • LesserAbe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    I realize it could be a lot harder to organize but I’d be interested in a version of this where the size of the country corresponds to the number of countries it touches. In this version seems like we get some weird shapes/sizes just to fit everything into a circle.

  • niktemadur@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    There are several seas here: Red, Mediterranean, Black and Caspian. The Arctic and Antarctic Oceans are not represented, that’ll minimize the perimeters of Canada and Russia.

    Overall, this is a very intriguing visualization of the political world. Fascinating stuff. Which I’m not sure I fully understand, don’t get what “topology” refers to, but to me it evokes an image highlighting different altitudes, as with mountains, valleys and coastlines.

    • Pulptastic
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      If altitude is portrayed I don’t see it. I think this map is purely to show borders/adjacency without consideration of size and only vague consideration of location. Size kinda sorta correlates with the number of adjacent countries but also seems a bit arbitrary.

  • _NoName_@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Why is India so small on the map? I am confused by the size choices here. Is it based on neighboring nations?

    Edit: ya know, I really should’a read the text.

  • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    This could actually be really handy if you want to do a road trip and spend as much time in customs as humanly possible.

  • tombruzzo@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    This is like the UK Metro map of the world.

    Now do one of Middle Ages Europe