The idea of American suburbs is that everyone (read: settlers) will live like royalty. You will have your own horse and buggy (SUV), and you will be so wealthy that your land is simply used to grow grass, as a flex. It is a celebration of excess.
The worst thing about lawns is that they are like castles or villas by the sea: luxury goods invented for the exclusive pleasure of a very rich minority, and which in conception and nature were never intended for the people.
As soon as a person/consumer acquires a lawn, their demand for lawns jumps to a higher level, and the more of other people’s lawns that are around, the more diluted the value of one’s own lawn becomes; the economy functionally cannot meet the demand for people having a lawn.
Suburb brain comes from an old
tradition of flexing on the poors by having land that was not used to grow food. I am not kidding. That was the flex.
The idea of American suburbs is that everyone (read: settlers) will live like royalty. You will have your own horse and buggy (SUV), and you will be so wealthy that your land is simply used to grow grass, as a flex. It is a celebration of excess.
Such a good essay.
https://unevenearth.org/2018/08/the-social-ideology-of-the-motorcar/
As soon as a person/consumer acquires a lawn, their demand for lawns jumps to a higher level, and the more of other people’s lawns that are around, the more diluted the value of one’s own lawn becomes; the economy functionally cannot meet the demand for people having a lawn.
Begun, the lawn wars have.
God I remember my uncle’s lawn-feud with his neighbor, them constantly trying to one-up each other with nicer lawns. Pathetic.
I think it was first (or at least equally) a flex by
, and quickly spread from there.
yeah but oaks dont grow food either, they could plant oaks. they’re trees. they’re amazing. more trees.
it would provide shade in the summer, lowering the AC bills. for fuck’s sake.