• jordanlund@lemmy.worldOPM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yup, but if you want to win an election you don’t tell potential voters “So, yeah, I’m going to end your industry and put you all out of work. LOL. Learn to code or something…”

        • BreadstickNinja@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 months ago

          Exactly. Talk about the new jobs you’re going to create. Do NOT tell people you are banning their present livelihood. She would be insane to tell Pennsylvania voters she was planning to significantly restrict fracking.

        • archomrade [he/him]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Better to tell potential voters “so, yea, I’m just going to pretend your drinking water isn’t being poisoned by industrial fossil fuel extraction because that would hurt a private industry that’s important for this other constituency. LOL drink bottled water or something”

          • Bananigans@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            The constituents have priorities, and for some of them, livelihood comes before long-term health complications. At the end of the day, votes tell us which of those they value more.

            • archomrade [he/him]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              If only those long term health impacts were limited to the people who were deciding their livelihood was more important.