ā€œJill Stein is a useful idiot for Russia. After parroting Kremlin talking points and being propped up by bad actors in 2016 sheā€™s at it again,ā€ DNC spokesman Matt Corridoni said in a statement toĀ The Bulwark. ā€œJill Stein wonā€™t become president, but her spoiler candidacyā€”that both the GOP and Putin have previously shown interest inā€”can help decide who wins. A vote for Stein is a vote for Trump.ā€

  • archomrade [he/him]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    Ā·
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    It is so far opposed to reality that I just canā€™t have a discussion with this poster if it believes this nonsense.

    My pronouns are very publicly displayed in my displayname, you can fuck off with your intentional dehumanization. It seems like youā€™re going out of your way to not accuse me of illegitimacy directly, but you sure as hell seem content to imply Iā€™m a russian asset, a bot, or both. While I appreciate your intentional avoidance of accusing me of those things to my face (not for a lack of clearly wishing you could without getting moderated), Iā€™d appreciate it even more if you could resist the urge to speak to me/about me in the third person and refer to me as ā€˜itā€™.

    If you think this poster is on the right course, youā€™re as lost as it is, and youā€™re doing Putinā€™s dirty work for him. We can and do criticize Team Blue here, but thereā€™s a difference between saying Dems arenā€™t liberal enough for some of our tastes and saying Dems are just as Fascist as the Republicans. I call that bullshit out here, and invite you to reconsider if you buy this bullshit or not.

    Thereā€™s a lot of accusations in this response, and Iā€™m not willing to sift through them all individually, but I think I can easily address this one.

    Iā€™m not accusing the democrats of being ā€˜the sameā€™ or ā€˜as badā€™ as republicans. Iā€™m not even accusing them of being fascist generally. What I am accusing them of is entertaining the fascistic and xenophobic fears of fascists in order to appease them. Of course this is a campaign strategy to beat Trump - that is not my objection. My point is that Trump is simply a symptom of a far deeper fascistic impulse that is growing within the American electorate, and affirming those anxieties (while abandoning any defense of minorities actively under threat, including Trans and Muslim Americans in order to ā€˜not alienateā€™ ā€œā€œmoderateā€ā€ voters (i feel gross even writing that in double scarequotes)) only fans those flames of fascism.

    If youā€™re only concern is winning a single election against a loud and obnoxious fascist bafoon, go ahead and turn a blind-eye to the rhetoric the democrats are using in order to appease those ā€œā€ā€œā€ā€œmoderateā€ā€œā€ā€œā€ voters. But if youā€™re at all concerned about the growing fascist movement in the US, you would be wise to acknowledge concerning trend of democrats ceding political and rhetorical ground to the right. Legitimizing fascist fears and welcoming them into the democratic party isnā€™t going to help drive them away, and only a fool would think so.

    PS: Iā€™m glad to see that it seems like /r/politics on Reddit and most other forums on the Internet

    Huh, what a strange place/moment to drop an advertisement for reddit. If youā€™re not a fan of federated social media, then you are more than welcome to fuck off back to Reddit.

    edit: is this the reddit you think is so much better moderated and free from bots lol?

    • TheHiddenCatboy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      Ā·
      7 hours ago

      My pronouns are very publicly displayed in my displayname, you can fuck off with your intentional dehumanization. It seems like youā€™re going out of your way to not accuse me of illegitimacy directly, but you sure as hell seem content to imply Iā€™m a russian asset, a bot, or both. While I appreciate your intentional avoidance of accusing me of those things to my face (not for a lack of clearly wishing you could without getting moderated), Iā€™d appreciate it even more if you could resist the urge to speak to me/about me in the third person and refer to me as ā€˜itā€™.

      This poster is demanding I show respect, here on the internet, where the Men are Men, the Women are Women, and the Children are FBI agents, while it and its ilk treat the rest of us like children at best and shit at worst. This poster bitches about the fact that I donā€™t see fit to refer to it as a person. Well, Iā€™ve been told in no uncertain terms I canā€™t call these posters out as the way I want to, so this is the best theyā€™re going to get. If they got their druthers, Iā€™d only be able to refer to them in the most glowing of terms, enforced by mods picked by them to stifle my dissent to their bullshit that Dems are in any way endorsing Fascism, and that the answer is to let an actual Fascist in by voting third party. Iā€™ll be damned if I give them any more respect than referring to them in this disconnected sense. And that theyā€™re leveraging a tool designed to let people be who they want to be gender-wise makes it worse.

      This poster splits hairs trying to claim that it didnā€™t call Democrats Fascist when it most clearly did:

      • point of comparison for just how fascist of a candidate they themselves would still be willing to vote for
      • But setting the electoral math aside for a second: eligibility odds arenā€™t a valid defense of being complicit in the most public international genocide in recent memory.
      • The democrats are already ceding ground to anti-LGBTQ and minority movements.

      Iā€™m fucking DONE with this bullshit. Iā€™m not going to let these claims stand unchallenged.

      And Iā€™m not going to just simply give up pointing out the stupidity expressed in these postersā€™ positions either.

      A majority of americans (sic) support halting arms shipments to Israel.

      ā€¦except it didnā€™t. It said 52% +/- 3.5%, based on a survey of 1000 people, support halting arms shipments to Israel until attacks on Gaza stop. That is within the margin of error, and could be as low at 49%. And a whole 21%, again +/- 3.5%, arenā€™t sure if we should halt weapons shipments to Gaza and 27%, again +/- 3.5%, suggest we should maintain support for Israel. What happens if Iran or Syria or the rest of the Middle East jump Israelā€™s case while weā€™re withholding weapons? Note that the article ALSO doesnā€™t address demographics in this 1000 person poll. If you poll 1000 people of Arabic decent, Iā€™m sure youā€™ll get a different result than if you poll 1000 Jews or 1000 Christians or 1000 Republicans. The poll itself makes clear Republicans have a much more militant view on this!

      Since my point was that weā€™d only need to turn off 50% of Jews to lose far more votes than we gain from this poster and its ilk, it dishonestly blows this bullshit in our face, ignoring my point altogether, and then gets all offended and shit over pronouns. I stand by what I said. There are no heroes over in Gaza, just villains and victims. And how many of these people saying they want to stop arms shipments are part of the ā€˜vote blue no matter whoā€™, given the OTHER guy who has any chance of winning has said heā€™s going to ship MORE guns and bombs to Israel! Meanwhile, closer to homeā€¦

      Oh right. This poster has a line for that too.

      If youā€™re only concern is winning a single election against a loud and obnoxious fascist bafoon (sic), go ahead and turn a blind-eye to the rhetoric the democrats are using in order to appease those ā€œā€ā€œā€ā€œmoderateā€ā€œā€ā€œā€ voters.

      1. More bullshit accusing Dems of catering to Fascists
      2. YES, I am more concerned about winning a single election against a loud and obnoxious fascist buffoon who has a clearly spelled out plan on how exactly heā€™s going to ā€˜make it so you donā€™t have to vote againā€™. If youā€™re fucking concerned about what happens next, maybe get Jill Stein to start working the day after the election to stand up RCV and other voting initiatives and work to get Third Parties elected in large enough numbers so that future possible Third Party candidates for POTUS have some allies in Congress, maybe? Thatā€™s what Iā€™m going to tell thisā€¦poster.

      You kind of need to worry about your own home before you start worrying about the homes across the street, unfortunately. Doubly so when the choice is between a woman who may not be doing enough to placate all the posters coming out of the woodwork shitting on the Democrats and only passively mentioning how horrible the Republicans are, and the Republicans who are gonna do everything these people and the CONFIRMED bots from Russia say the Dems are gonna do, dialled up to 11, not only to the people these people are ā€˜concernedā€™ about, and a whole bunch of extra people, right here.

      Iā€™m just done with the nonsense being spewed on Lemmy by people who seem to be all to eager to do the same kind of ā€˜blow up every molehill into a mountainā€™ that confirmed Russian Troll Farms did with Clinton in 2016 and end us up with another 4 years of Trump. At least in 2016, Hillary DID have that stench of Third-Way Corrupt Democrat and we didnā€™t know what Trump would do versus what he said, but itā€™s 2024, people. We know Trump is going to do what he says heā€™s going to do, and Harris is light-years better than Clinton.

      PS: I find it amusing that what was a claim that Lemmy lets stand Russian propaganda got turned around into an endorsement of Reddit. And this poster wonders why I donā€™t consider it worthy of directly endorsing. I may not be allowed here on Lemmy to directly say any given poster is a Russian Propagandist, Bot, or Useful Idiot, but Lemmy canā€™t stop me from having those thoughts and choosing how Iā€™m going to interact with these people. Maybe if this poster wants me to treat it was respect, this poster can start treating us with respect and stop accusing us of being blind to Fascism.

      • archomrade [he/him]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        Ā·
        6 hours ago

        A majority of americans (sic) support halting arms shipments to Israel.

        ā€¦except it didnā€™t. It said 52% +/- 3.5%, based on a survey of 1000 people, support halting arms shipments to Israel until attacks on Gaza stop. That is within the margin of error, and could be as low at 49%. And a whole 21%, again +/- 3.5%, arenā€™t sure if we should halt weapons shipments to Gaza and 27%, again +/- 3.5%, suggest we should maintain support for Israel.

        Lmao, idk what to tell you thatā€™s a majority, according to the poll. Margins of error and samples or respondents areā€¦ well thatā€™s just how polls work. If youā€™re simply worried about losing votes, then you could even include those that are ā€˜unsureā€™, or some portion thereof, since if the democrats actually made the case against continuing to support an active genocide, a good portion of those ā€˜unsureā€™ would likely see reason.

        Since my point was that weā€™d only need to turn off 50% of Jews to lose far more votes than we gain from this poster and its ilk, it dishonestly blows this bullshit in our face, ignoring my point altogether, and then gets all offended and shit over pronouns.

        And my point is that it isnā€™t just Stein voters (which very well may outnumber registration numbers and previous election numbers given the intense dissatisfaction with the democratic gaza policy, among others) democrats need to worry about - there are also Undecided voters and voters who will decide not to vote at all. That, and youā€™re assuming that Jewish Americans will decide that Trump is better, not just that they disagree with that particular policy.

        And, again, all of this is a digression over whether continued support for Israelā€™s genocide is even defensible, a perspective with which I very much disagree with. Electoralist rhetoric has this unfortunate tendency to deflect debate away from actual policy decisions and supplant it with whatever policies win you the election. I think you know continued unconditioned military aid to Israel is indefensible, but itā€™s far easier to ā€˜whataboutā€™ the other guy.

        1. More bullshit accusing Dems of catering to Fascists

        This you?

        This poster wants you to believe that what Harris is doing to cater to the middle makes her equivalent to Trump. It does not. Sheā€™s trying to bring everyone to the table, and believes that not screaming to the high hills how Left she is is the best way to make Trump fail again in 2024. I do think she should go more like ā€œHey, Moderate Republicans. Thanks for your vote. Please, stay during this election, but after the Election is over, go back and fix your party. [LMAO at this] Weā€™re not going to become Republican Lite over here for you. You need to fix your party so America can have two choices again,ā€ but I wonā€™t hold it against her if she doesnā€™t do that.

        The people you call ā€œModerate Republicansā€ - the ones that you say Harris is ā€˜reaching out toā€™ - I consider to be fascistic. Theyā€™re the ones who think immigrants are jumping the boarder and bringing drugs and weapons, and theyā€™re the ones who Harris is appealing to by supporting greater asylum restrictions and funding for more border agents. Theyā€™re the ones who think sexuality is binary and that gender should be enforced in public, the ones who might get spooked if Harris publically defended trans rights.

        What you call ā€˜screaming to the hills about how Left she isā€™, I think is basic humanitarianism. Avoiding the defense of trans rights is conceding that they are even up for debate to begin with.

        You kind of need to worry about your own home before you start worrying about the homes across the street, unfortunately.

        Why am I not surprised to see this conservative idiom in your comment?

        Iā€™m just done with the nonsense being spewed on Lemmy by people who seem to be all to eager to do the same kind of ā€˜blow up every molehill into a mountainā€™ that confirmed Russian Troll Farms did with Clinton in 2016 and end us up with another 4 years of Trump.

        Lmao, Clinton lost because she arrogantly believed she didnā€™t need to address progressive concerns, just like Harris is doing now. She and her supporters derided them as ā€œBernie Brosā€. She didnā€™t lose because of russian interference, she lost because she was a fundamentally bad candidate.

        I happen to be tired of the liberal bullshit being spewed here, personally. I think thereā€™s precious little pushback, in part because .world has actively defederated from everyone to the left of them. If you find .worldā€™s politics intolerable, you should really try spending time in an instance that hasnā€™t gone as far out of their way to avoid leftist perspectives.

        This poster is demanding I show respect, here on the internet, where the Men are Men, the Women are Women, and the Children are FBI agents, while it and its ilk treat the rest of us like children at best and shit at worst. This poster bitches about the fact that I donā€™t see fit to refer to it as a person. Well, Iā€™ve been told in no uncertain terms I canā€™t call these posters out as the way I want to, so this is the best theyā€™re going to get.

        Lmao, is this, like, a copypasta? I mean I would be more upset by this, if it werenā€™t for the fact that youā€™ve had other comments removed that start almost word-for-word like thisā€¦ The lady doth protest too much, methinks

        You actually remind me of another user here that was repeatedly banned for constantly accusing other users of being russian trolls, even going so far as to follow them around and link them into unrelated threads to pester them for proof they werenā€™t trolls. I would never say you were that userā€™s soc account, but holy fuck do you share a similar fervor for that obsession. It might be time to log off and touch some grass, bud.