Former President Donald Trump finds himself thrust back into the spotlight amidst resurfaced allegations of sexual misconduct involving minors. These accusations stem from a 2016 lawsuit filed by an anonymous plaintiff known as "Katie Johnson," alleging that Trump and the late Jeffrey Epstein engaged in severe acts of abuse and exploitation.

Article from July 4, 2024. Via Reddit.

  • BigMacHole@lemm.ee
    822·
    2 months ago

    He could Rape a 13 Year Old on 5th Avenue and I would STILL VOTE FOR HIM (because I want Trans Kids to Kill Themselves! And Mexicans!)! Pro Life! Save The Children!

    • Mirshe@lemmy.world
      8·
      2 months ago

      A lot of them DON’T WANT trans kids to kill themselves, or immigrants, or whatever.

      A scary amount WANT TO DO THE KILLING.

    • j4k3@lemmy.worldEnglish
      61·
      2 months ago
      Save the children for Trump! Stop the immigrants from JD Couch molester!

      Trump for Aztec emperor of women’s bodies and weirdo party couches! Let’s go with the worst president by all metrics in all of US history! Why? Inbreeding! Who? All of us. The problem with kids these days is not enough huffing of leaded gasoline!

    • dalekcaan@lemm.ee
      5·
      2 months ago

      I mean, I’d expect one to face a little more than “scrutiny,” but here we are.

  • Coreidan@lemmy.worldEnglish
    34·
    2 months ago

    Just one? There’s gotta be more. Trump doesn’t strike me as the type of fella that would stop after only raping one 13 year old.

  • johannesvanderwhales@lemmy.world
    101·
    2 months ago

    Does he actually, though? Haven’t really seen this mentioned at all recently from any reputable news source or the Harris campaign.

        • qooqie@lemmy.world
          251·
          2 months ago

          Isn’t trump a pedo for sure though? He’s been to Epstein island how many times?

        • Zexks@lemmy.world
          181·
          2 months ago

          It doesn’t help dems. maga doesn’t give a fuck. He could kill someone while raping a kid in broad daylight on camera and they’d still support him. The only this it might do is help put him in jail AND EVEN THAT is spurious. Which is fucking insane.

        • PenguinMage@lemmy.world
          71·
          2 months ago

          Honestly don’t care for it as ammunition against him I was always just angry about the idea of it as a whole. If he did and if he didn’t couldn’t change my opinion of his character as a whole. But he was always chummy with Epstein, is listed as doe whatever # and every single person who took that plane is complacent in something deep enough for jail time.

          *edit Epstein stupid phone

    • Five@slrpnk.netOPEnglish
      251·
      2 months ago

      Unsubstantiated by Snopes is not the same as false.

        • Five@slrpnk.netOPEnglish
          61·
          2 months ago

          Yes, unsubstantiated means “no evidence.”

          As the saying goes, absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.

          • Aqarius@lemmy.world
            23·
            2 months ago

            “…so really, who’s to say they’re not eating cats? After all, absence of evidence is not…”