• LustyArgonian@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    1 month ago

    “Trump can’t actually do any of those horrible things,” -friend who doesn’t understand politics and hasn’t been following anything

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Trump’s going to put a bunch of social media grifters and narcissists into his cabinet and really get things done. The GOP is simply too competent to fail.

      We definitely won’t have municipal elections in 2025 or state elections in 2026. And nothing will go so wrong that people abandon the Republican Party like they did in 2018.

      Elections will be cancelled, just like they were after 2002 and 2016, when Republicans had a three branch monopoly. And no liberal will ever be so popular as to threaten establishment conservative politics.

      • vonbaronhans
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Man. I want to believe that, I really do.

        But the man literally led a coup attempt. A shitty, ineffective one, but he tried nonetheless.

        Last time Trump was held back by guardrails, people in the administrative government and in his cabinet kept his worst behavior in check.

        This time, we’re already seeing plans to dismantle all that. Only install loyalists, remove anyone else. As in, literally demoting military higher ups who won’t kiss the ring.

        I just hope they’re still too incompetent to do any irreversible damage. But fuck me, man. It’s hard to be hopeful.

        • pingveno@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 month ago

          From what I hear, one of the most important guardrails last time was the 5S system: smile, say sure, subsequently shred. Trump lacks focus and follow through for anything except his core interests, so some of the people close to him apparently got away with simply not carrying out some of his more boneheaded demands.

          • paddirn@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 month ago

            Yeah, but that was when he wanted the appearance of respectability and brought in some establishment Republicans who hadn’t drank the koolaid. The people he’s nominating now are loyalists through and through who won’t have any reservations to give in to his worse demands.

            • pingveno@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              I’m not sure it was ever about respectability. I think he just didn’t have his shit together to actually be president. Campaigns usually start making transition plans long ahead of the election.

              The other thing was that he didn’t have as much of a stranglehold on the Republican Party in 2016. It was still very possible to be a politician in open opposition to Donald Trump. So when it came time to pick someone, he couldn’t pick and choose proven loyalists. He just had to choose from among ranks of people who may or may not be hostile.

      • oatscoop
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        narcissists into his cabinet

        The great thing about narcissists is they’re narcissists: they only care about themselves, they’re thin skinned, and they’re vindictive.

        There is no chance in hell this admin is going to be efficient. One of the things that stands to save the USA is the inevitable infighting of Trump’s cabinet and party.

      • Dragon Rider (drag)@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 month ago

        No, you don’t want to put narcissists in your cabinet if you’re a fascist dictator. Narcissists will covet your position and seek power for themselves. If you’re a fascist movement, you can afford to have one narcissist at the top, but everybody on the bottom has to be yes-men. You want the bulk of your movement to be white men who crave a powerful masculine figure to dominate them. You want submissives. That’s not where you’ll find 99% of narcissists. You’ll find 99% of narcissists on the left, saying that they’re entitled to more pay and fewer hours. You’ll find 99% of narcissists refusing to be dominated by other people and fighting for equality. You’ll find 99% of narcissists trying to make the world a better place.