• Pacattack57@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    12 minutes ago

    They remove the extra ports because they take up space in the board.

    That aside if you’re buying Mac you took it from yourself. No one made you buy it.

  • Shady_Shiroe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 hours ago

    To make our laptops look clean and minimalistic, they made us buy a bunch of dongles and adapters.

    Screw it, I’m buying a rugged laptop with the thickness of a desktop PC next

  • JimVanDeventer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    3 hours ago

    USB-C does a lot of heavy lifting. Also, MagSafe™ is still there. A little surprised there is also a SD card slot. And a HDMI port. Not complaining about their inclusion, and I do use them regularly, but why did the dongle company give these to us?

  • dinckel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    82
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I dont know why this is controversial. I’m way more happy with 4x USB-C, than 5 unique ports, that will likely never be used on a regular basis, even when they were relevant

  • fury@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I’m on the other side wishing peripherals would catch up and all become USB-C already. I’m tired of USB-A.

  • Todd Bonzalez@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    73
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Dude, those two little UBS-C ports do 50x what the ports on the bottom laptop could do

    • ripcord@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      64
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      5 hours ago

      That’s true and good, but I still want to be able to plug on an HDMI or Ethernet cable without a damn adapter.

      • filcuk@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        5 hours ago

        The laptop may actually be too thin for either. Want those ports? Vote with your money, buy a different laptop.

        As for hdmi at least, you can get a usb-c-ended cable too.

    • Michal@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      They can’t do anything if you don’t have a usb c device to connect to it. Ethernet? Hdmi? A simple fucking memory stick?

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I just wish they would give us more than two ports, one of them is the power port anyway so technically they’re only giving you one port, which I think is about three ports too few.

    • Justagamer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I prefer if USB-C to whatever cables become a standard. That way I can get a cheap cable and plug it into whatever.

    • Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      But only twice. You know the problem with having a network port on a usb is that the laptop no longer has a unique mac address, which can cause problems with authentication in a corporate environment. So when building devices or using mac auth it can be a nightmare.

  • kryptonidas@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I’m glad I can plug in one port and have a dual display setup, all peripherals, speakers, ethernet, charging, etc connected at my desk in one go.

    If I want to leave, unplug one thing and I’m good to go.

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      58 minutes ago

      Yup, and that’s fantastic if you’re working at a consistent desk or something. I have a USB-C hub at home and a USB-C monitor at work, which is pretty nice.

      However, what’s not nice is connecting ad-hoc. Let’s say I go to an unfamiliar meeting room, HDMI is the way to go. Or if I’m going to plug in to my TV at a rental property or something. Or I’m at a friend’s house and I want to transfer a bunch of data and they have a USB-A drive. I’m not going to bring a hub around with me everywhere I go, I’d prefer to just plug in whatever I need into the laptop directly.

      USB-C is great, not having other options as well isn’t great. Give me 2-3 USB-C ports that can all do charging, display out, and data, and also give me a handful of other ports (HDMI, USB-A, RJ-45, headphone jack, etc). It’s very rare to find a laptop too thin to support it, most “thin” laptops are merely curved at the edge to make it look thin, when really it’s plenty thick to support even full-fat RJ-45 (which it doesn’t even need to, I’ve seen thin laptops with a flip-down port).

    • woelkchen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Outside the Apple world, a dock connector has been the norm way before USB C was invented.

      • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I miss actual dock connectors. Cramming everything into a single USB-C connection has always been problematic for me. I have a lot of stuff.

        My work laptop has a USB-C dock where I have Ethernet (1000mbps), three display port displays, mouse, keyboard, wireless headset dongle, and a dual head USB to displayport adapter.

        That’s a lot of bandwidth.

        I frequently have little problems keeping everything working correctly.

        Luckily, I don’t push high bandwidth video though any display for work, so generally I don’t see many bandwidth problems.

    • otp@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I’m glad I can purchase an external dock for an extra few hundred dollars to get the functionality back that existed in older models

      • jdeath@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        they start around $10 or $20. don’t think you need to waste hundreds for a few extra ports

      • ShovelDad@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        4 hours ago

        It would be pretty annoying to have to unplug/plug in everything that the previous commenter mentioned every time you wanted to move your laptop. So for something that’s meant to be a portable work station, I think it makes sense to use a stationary adapter over a bunch of individual ports on the laptop itself. It would be nice if it was common for laptops to come with an adapter that includes all the ports that are commonly used though.

        • 0ops@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Exactly my situation. My laptop has enough ports that I don’t strictly need a dock. I still have and use two though, one for home and one at work

      • InFerNo@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        We bought some for work to trial and they cost 65€, so hardly hundreds

  • 01011@monero.town
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    58 minutes ago

    I’m okay with USB-C and a headphone jack on my laptop. The other shit is for the birds.

  • HeartyOfGlass@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    127
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Fuck firewire. Glad it’s dead. USB C is the best thing to happen to peripherals since the mouse.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      75
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      7 hours ago

      USB C is the best thing to happen to peripherals since the mouse.

      I would agree with you if there were a simple way to tell what the USB-C cable I have in my hand can be used for without knowing beforehand. Otherwise, for example, I don’t know whether the USB-C cable will charge my device or not. There should have been a simple way to label them for usage that was baked into the standard. As it is, the concept is terrific, but the execution can be extremely frustrating.

      • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Buying a basic, no-frills USB-C cable from a reputable tech manufacturer all but guarantees that it’ll work for essentially any purpose. Of course the shoddy pack-in cables included with a cheap device purchase won’t work well.

        I replaced every USB-C-to-C or -A-to-C cable and brick in my house and carry bag with a very low cost Anker cable (except the ones that came with my Google products, those are fine), and now anything charges on any cable.

        You wouldn’t say that a razor sucked just because the cheap replacement blades you bought at the dollar store nicked your face, or that a pan was too confusing because the dog food you cooked in it didn’t taste good. So too it is not the fault of USB-C that poorly manufactured charging bricks and cables exist. The standard still works; in fact, it works so well that unethical companies are flooding the market with crap.

      • HeartyOfGlass@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        44
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Hey that’s a fair point. Funny how often good ideas are kneecapped by crap executions.

        • NobodyElse@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          34
          ·
          6 hours ago

          I’m pretty sure the phrase “kneecapped by crap executions” is in the USB working groups’s charter. It’s like one of their core guiding principles.

          • db2@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            19
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 hours ago

            If anyone disagrees with this, the original USB spec was for a reversible connector and the only reason we didn’t get to have that the whole time was because they wanted to increase profit margins.

            • Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              17
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              5 hours ago

              USB has always been reversible. In fact you have to reverse it at least 3 times before it’ll FUCKING PLUG IN.

            • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              4 hours ago

              That’s the reason Apple released the Lightning connector. Apple pushed for several features for USB ~2010, including a reversible connector, but the USB-IF refused. Apple wanted USB-C, but couldn’t wait for the USB-IF to come to an agreement so they could replace the dated 20-pin connector.

      • rumba@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Burn all the USBC cables with fire except PD. The top PD cable does everything the lower cable does.

          • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            1 hour ago

            Correct. The other commenter is giving bad advice.

            Both power delivery and bandwidth are backwards compatible, but they are independent specifications on USB-C cables. You can even get PD capable USB-C cables that don’t transmit data at all.

            Also, that’s not true for Thunderbolt cables. Each of the 5 versions have specific data and power delivery minimum and maximum specifications.

        • Janovich@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          5 hours ago

          IDK I’ve had PD cables that looked good for a while but turns out their data rate was basically USB2. It seems no matter what rule of thumb I try there are always weird caveats.

          No, I’m not bitter, why would you ask that?

          • rumba@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            4 hours ago

            You forgot thunderbolt and usb4 exists now

            You can buy a single cable that does 40GB and USB4 and charges at 240w.

      • TORFdot0@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Do not all USB C cables have the capability to do Power Delivery? I thought it was up to the port you plugged it in to support it?

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Nope. My daughter is notorious for mixing up cables when they come out of the brick. Some charge her tablet, some are for data transfer, some charge other devices but not her tablet. It’s super confusing. I had to start labeling them for her.

          • TORFdot0@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            5 hours ago

            Come to think of it, all the USB C cables I have are from phone and device chargers so I just took it for granted. Good to know. Thanks for sharing some knowledge with me

            • InputZero@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              4 hours ago

              USB-c cables can vary drastically. Power delivery alone ranges from less than 1 amp at 5 volts to over 5 amps at 20 volts. That’s 5 watts of power on the low end to 100 watts of power on the high end and sometimes more. When a cable meant to run at 5 watts has over 100 watts of power run through, the wires get really hot and could catch fire. The charger typically needs to talk to a very small chip in the high power cables for the cables to say, yes I can handle the power. Really cheap chargers might just push that power out regardless. So while the USB-c form factor is the one plug to rule them all, the actual execution is a fucking mess.

      • Krzd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Yeah, I totally get that there is a need for cheap power only cables, but why are there what feels like 30 different data “standards”. Just gimme power-only, data, and fast-data. And yeah, in 2 years there’ll be a faster data protocol, so what, that’s then fast-data24, fast-data26, etc. and manufacturers have to use a specific pictogram to label them according to the highest standard they fulfill.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Damn, check out the price of the thing someone else linked to at AliExpress for a fraction of that price. But having to spend money on that should not be necessary.

          • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            4 hours ago

            That aliexpress device doesn’t tell you what wattage or data speed the cable will max out doing. Just what wattage it’s currently doing (to which you’d need to make sure that the device you’re testing with on the other side is capable and not having it’s own issues). Also can’t tell you if the cable is have intermittent problems. If all you care about is wattage, then fine. But I find myself caring more about the supported data speeds and quality of the cable.

            But yes, I agree that cables should just be marked what they’re rated for… However it’s possible well built cables exceed that spec and could do better than they’re claiming which just puts us in the same boat of not really knowing.

            Edit: oh! and that aliexpress tester is only 4 lines(usb2.0 basically)… usb 3.0 in type c is 24 pins… You’re not testing jack shit on that aliexpress. The device I linked will actually map the pins in the cable and will find you breaks as well.

    • viking@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      44
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 hours ago

      I agree with USB-C, but there are still a million USB-A devices I need to use, and I can’t be bothered to buy adapters for all of them. And a USB hub is annoying.

      Plus, having 1-2 USB-C ports only is never gonna be enough. If they are serious about it, why not have 5?

      • iopq@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 hours ago

        I bought some adaptors in China for around $0.50 each. It really isn’t that big of a deal

      • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        You can’t buy a UCB-C Wifi dongle that last time I checked. You have to buy a c-to-a adapter, then use a usb-a wifi dongle. It’s nuts that those don’t exist.

        • Lemming421@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          5 hours ago

          Genuine question - what device do you have that has USB-C ports, no USB-A ports, doesn’t have WiFi, but supports the dongle?

          • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 hours ago

            Pinetab2 shipped with a wifi chip without any Linux drivers. The drivers eventually got made, but before that, you needed a USB dongle with Ethernet or a adapter.

            I would also like a USB-c wifi dongle for tech support reasons. Sometimes, the wifi hardware fails and you need a quick replacement to figure out what happened.

          • Krzd@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 hours ago

            Some applications need very specific drivers and protocols that aren’t compatible with normal chips. Or you have to connect to a device via WiFi but still need internet. Also long range WiFi antennas are amazing.

    • jerkface@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      6 hours ago

      I hated when mice became the primary interface to computers, and I still do.

        • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          5 hours ago

          I agree with OP and I haven’t used a tiling WM in years (used XMonad BTW; i3 was okay). I currently use KDE Plasma 6 because it doesn’t have many drawbacks (used GNOME until Wayland worked properly on KDE), and I can use it pretty well w/o a mouse.

        • jerkface@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          6 hours ago

          Even for like 20 years after mousing became the primary interface, you could still navigate much faster using keyboard shortcuts / accelerator keys. Application designers no longer consider that feature. Now you are obliged to constantly take your fingers off home position, find the mouse, move it 3cm, aim it carefully, click, and move your hand back to home position, an operation taking a couple of seconds or more, when the equivalent keyboard commands could have been issued in a couple hundred milliseconds.

          • Wav_function@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            19
            ·
            6 hours ago

            I love how deeply nerdy Lemmy is. I’m a bit of a nerd but I’m not “mice were a mistake” nerd.

            • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              5 hours ago

              I don’t think mice were a mistake, but they’re worse for most of the tasks I do. I’m a software engineer and I suck at art, so I just need to write, compile, and test code.

              There are some things a mouse is way better for:

              • drawing (well, a drawing tablet is better)
              • 3d modeling
              • editing photos
              • first person shooters (KB works fine for OG Doom though)
              • bulk file operations (a decent KB interface could work though)

              But for almost everything else, I prefer a keyboard.

              And while we’re on a tangent, I hate WASD, why shift my fingers over from the normal home row position? It should be ESDF, which feels way more natural…

              • Wav_function@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                4 hours ago

                Thanks, I got you beat on ESDF though because i’m a RDFG man, since playing counter strike 1.6. With WASD they usually put crouch or something on ctrl but my pinky has a hard time stretching down there, but on RDFG my pinky has easy access to QW AS ZX, and tab caps and shift with a little stretch. It’s come in handy when playing games with a lot of keybinds.

                • jerkface@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  4 hours ago

                  Pfff, minutes after trying to minimize your nerdiness, you post this confession.

                • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  4 hours ago

                  What pisses me off even more is many games bind to the letter instead of physical key position (e.g. key code), so alternative layouts get a big middle finger. I use Dvorak, and I’ve quit fighting and just switch to QWERTY for games.

                  I don’t have a problem with hitting control (I guess I have big hands), but I totally agree that default key binds largely suck. I wish games came with a handful of popular ones, and bound to key codes so hs Dvorak users (or international users) didn’t have to keep switching to QWERTY.

              • jerkface@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                5 hours ago

                I always rebind to ESDF if the game doesn’t do stupid things preventing it from being practical. The addition of the 1QAZ strip being available to the pinky is a killer feature all on its own. I typically use that for weapon switching, instead of having to stretch up to 1234 and take my fingers off the movement keys.

                Tablets are better than mice at drawing, modelling, and photo editing. Mice are good for first person shooters. Game controllers are better for most other games. You can mouse in dired-mode i guess, if you’re a casual.

                • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  4 hours ago

                  The problem is they generally use E and F for something, which results in a cascade of rebinding.

                  And yeah, tablets are better, but they’re also more expensive and don’t do other mice things. For how rarely I do 3D modeling and whatnot (pretty rare), making sure my mouse has a middle button is plenty.

                  And yeah, I much prefer controller, even for FPS since I don’t play competitively (even then, I’ve seen awesome videos about gyro aiming).

            • jerkface@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              5 hours ago

              It’s also an age thing. My visual processing is getting worse and worse. My disorientation facing a busy screen with literally thousands of objects that can be interacted with by mouse is a cognitive drain compared to a textual interface where I do most of the work abstractly without having to use visual processing at all. Like reading a book vs watching a movie.

              I probably have a lot more experience using pre-mouse era computers than most people. It’s like being asked to start using a different language when you are 20. Yeah, you’ll become perfectly fluent for a couple decades… but you’ll also lose that language first when you get old.

              I have noticed that millenials navigate multilayer mouse interfaces (like going down a few chained drop down menus) way faster than I ever did. And zoomers use touch screen keyboards almost as well as I ever touchtyped. Brains are only plastic to a degree, and it just plain feels good to use all those neurons that you first laid down when you were young and your mind was infinite.

          • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 hours ago

            That functionality (first necessary, then required by guidelines, then expected, and then still usual) disciplined UI designers to make things doable in a clear sequence of actions.

            Now they think any ape can make a UI if it knows the new shiny buzzwords like “material design” or “air” or whatever. And they do! Except humans can’t use those UIs.

            BTW, about their “air”. One can look at ancient UI paradigms, specifically SunView, OpenLook and Motif (I’m currently excited about Sun history again), Windows 3.*, and also Win9x (with WinXP being more or less inside the same paradigm). And one can see that of these only Motif had anything resembling their “air”. And Motif is generally considered clunky and less usable than the rest of the mentioned (I personally consider OpenLook the best), but compared to modern UIs even Motif does that “air” part the way it seems to make some sense, and feels less clunky, making me wonder how is that even possible.

            FFS, modern UI designers don’t even think it’s necessary to clearly and consistently separate buttons and links from text.

            And also - freedom in Web and UI design has proven to be a mistake. UIs should be native. Web browsers should display pages adaptively (we have such and such blocks of text and such and such links), their appearance should be decided on the client and be native too, except pictures. Gemini is the right way to go for the Web.

            • jerkface@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              3 hours ago

              I feel your pain and irrelevancy with crystalline clarity. The world isn’t interested in doing things the right way, or even in a good way; consumers are too perversely enthralled by capital’s interests. I kind of hate that computers ever became a consumer good.

          • Agent641@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            6 hours ago

            I just use a mouse to type in stuff using the on screen keyboard. It’s annoying having to take the ball out and clean it, but you get used to it.

              • jerkface@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                5 hours ago

                I used the logitech optical trackball mouse for quite a few years! Did not play a lot of FPS a that time…

                • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  5 hours ago

                  I love trackballs (except that Kensington above. It was basically a pinch your skin torture device.) I still use the Logitech M570 trackball. It’s pretty good.

                  My favorite of all time though was the Logitech Trackman Vista. Absolutely perfect form factor that Logitech just gave up on one day and I will never know why.

            • Wav_function@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              6 hours ago

              Hey they made new technology where you can just yell at the computer and it’ll understand 60% of what you’re saying.

              • jerkface@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                3 hours ago

                Reminds me of the ancient technology where you just kick it until you get a more tractable problem.

            • jerkface@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              5 hours ago

              I kept every mouse ball I ever obtained and display them in my china cabinet.

          • Dozzi92@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            5 hours ago

            When I’m “computering” for efficiency, I don’t take my hands off the keyboard. Half of my job is on a standard keyboard, and so familiarizing myself with all the shortcuts and whatnot saves a lot of time versus having to travel back and forth to a mouse or track pad.

            When I am just satisfying the dopamine urges, it’s mouse all the way.

            • jerkface@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              5 hours ago

              Sure. It’s a lowest common denominator interface. With all that comes with that.

              • MutilationWave@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                4 hours ago

                Lowest common denominator interface is definitely touch screen, then maybe game controllers but I love those for some games.

                Edit - TV remotes!

          • Tarquinn2049@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 hours ago

            Sounds like I’m glad “home row” style typing fell out of favour. It may be the theoretically fastest way to type eventually, but it seems to lead to pretty rigid behaviour. Adapting to new things as they come along and changing your flow to move with them instead of against them is just a much more comfortable way to live. Even if I only type 80% as fast.

            • jerkface@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              5 hours ago

              I have no idea what you mean by “fell out of favour”. Does your keyboard not have pips on F and J? People still touch type. Dunno what to tell you.

              You’re getting hung up on “home row”. You still have to move your hand from the keyboard to the mouse and back. It’s the same problem, whether or not you know how to type well and stare at your hands, except now you have to add steps for “look at the screen” and “look back at your hands”.

              • Tarquinn2049@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                5 hours ago

                Fell out of favour in that it isn’t taught as “the correct way to type” any more. Largely because most devices you type on now wouldn’t even have physical keys. So learning home row typing for the occasional time the thing you are typing on is a physical full sized keyboard just disrupts the flow of everything else.

                Being perfectly optimal isn’t as productive as it feels, especially when it leads to resistance to change and adapt.

                • Ledivin@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  ·
                  5 hours ago

                  Home row is absolutely still taught as the “correct” way to type. Source: kids are in elementary school

                • jerkface@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  5 hours ago

                  Yes, it is taught. If you take a typing course, you will be taught to use home row. What you mean is, you were never taught to type because we don’t teach that in school anymore. If you do most your typing on a touch screen, I have to imagine: you are so young. In 20 years when no one is using a touch screen to enter text anymore (but likely still use physical keyboards), you will remember this conversation, and have some greater insight.

                  Whether or not you know how to touch type, in any situation where there is a mouse, THERE IS A PHYSICAL KEYBOARD. Not knowing how to touch type just makes the task switching overhead greater.

          • EatATaco@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            5 hours ago

            Sure, it’s not 100% better in all situations. But when you’re unfamiliar with something, almost universally, it’s far more intuitive.

            And this doesn’t even take into account things like gaming. I also can’t imagine trying to do visual design things solely with the computer. Like any type of drawing or schematic design.

            Being pretty adept at using the keyboard, I’m often frustrated when I find out that the only way to do something is by mouse when there appears that there should be an easy way to do it by keyboard. But, man, I can’t imagine longing for the days before the mouse.

            • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              5 hours ago

              Yes, the mouse is useful in many situations (esp 3d modeling), so I don’t think anyone is arguing that it shouldn’t exist.

              The problem, however, is that we’ve standardized on it for everything, to the point where software often ignores a better KB-driven workflow because the mouse one is good enough. “When all you have is a hammer…”

              We’ve prioritized “intuitive” over “efficient.” There’s nothing wrong with learning to properly use a tool, and it’s sad that we don’t expect users to put in that modicum of effort. In the 80s and 90s, that’s just how things were, you either learn the tools (often with a handbook) or you don’t use them. The net result was a populace that didn’t need support as much, because they were used to reading the docs. If a component died, the docs would tell you how to diagnose and fix it. These days, those docs just don’t exist, so if the solution isn’t intuitive, you replace it (both hardware and software).

              That’s where this frustration comes from. Making things intuitive also means reducing the average person’s understanding of their tools, and the mouse is a symptom of that shift.

              • EatATaco@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 hours ago

                We’ve prioritized “intuitive” over “efficient.”

                I would argue, overall, it’s more efficient to aim for the former than the latter, especially if we are talking about the wide range of people who need to use a computer.

                But I’m curious as to the “actions per minute” type of efficiency that people are talking about here. I’m an engineer, who has moved into computer programming. I would say the bottleneck for me is never that I have to move my hand to my mouse, but it’s always about thinking and planning. I feel like this “it’s so much more efficient” is viewing us as almost machines that are just trying to output actions, rather than think through and solve problems.

                The net result was a populace that didn’t need support as much, because they were used to reading the docs. If a component died, the docs would tell you how to diagnose and fix it.

                I think this is more of a problem that it went from an extremely niche thing, to something that almost everyone is required to use, rather than a move away from keyboard only. Or, maybe, the rise of the mouse opened the computer to everyone being able to use it, which is why it has become so ubiquitous.

                • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 hour ago

                  actions per minute

                  To me it’s more about ergonomics. Most of my time is spent reading code and sending messages. I use ViM or at least ViM bindings for reading code because it’s so much nicer for navigating code than clicking and scrolling:

                  • go to definition? - gd
                  • find in file? - /query
                  • match braces/quotes? - %

                  I’m not saying everyone should learn ViM, I’m just using it as an example. I’m much less concerned about maximizing my text entry speed and more interested in maximizing ergonomics of the tools I use the most every day. For me that’s my text editor and terminal, followed closely by my browser.

                  I have no problem with a good mouse UI (I love mouse mode in ViM), my problem is when there isn’t an alternative power user UX (shortcuts and whatnot).

                  This extends to a ton of things. Let’s say you want to search for a file, but the GUI indexed search isn’t working properly (maybe it didn’t index your file? Or maybe you need more than string contains?). If you’re comfortable on the CLI and understand regex, you’re set. Or maybe you need to do some bulk change across files, the CLI is going to be really efficient. It’s less about total productivity but not having to do stupid repetitive tasks because that’s my only option. I’d much rather write a script than do the repetitive thing even if the total time spent is equivalent.

                  People just aren’t learning the power user stuff these days and look at me like I’m a wizard because I can use tools written 40 years ago…

            • jerkface@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              5 hours ago

              I’ve used ion, ratpoison, i3, sawfish, and other tiling window managers for fifteen or more years, all totaled up. There is a great deal of pressure to use a modern desktop environment and it’s a lot of work maintaining my janky bespoke desktop environment functions necessary for a few critical applications. I use KDE’s tiling features and keyboard shortcuts, but it’s a double edged sword because I have to disable all window manager bindings in (for example) Blender and emacs to avoid shadowing important features. Actually, I have re-implemented a lot of my custom KDE shortcuts as emacs bindings as well, so they still work when emacs has the focus. Here’s one:

              (cl-flet ((switch-to (name)
              	    (lambda ()
              	      (interactive)
              	      (shell-command (concat "wmctrl -a " name)))))
                (global-set-key (kbd "s-1") (switch-to "librewolf"))
                (global-set-key (kbd "s-2") (switch-to "konsole"))
                (global-set-key (kbd "s-3") (switch-to "signal"))
                (global-set-key (kbd "s-4") (switch-to "darktable"))
                (global-set-key (kbd "s-5") (switch-to "emacs")))
              
              • Shareni@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                5 hours ago

                For my wm+Emacs work, I unified the shortcuts by calling a separate go bin that checks if the active window is Emacs or not. If it is, it sends the command to the Emacs Daemon. If it’s not it sends the command to i3. For directional commands like move focus, first check it there’s an Emacs window to that side, if not send the command to i3.

                • jerkface@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  4 hours ago

                  The things we have to go through just to meet basic needs.

                  How are you redirecting all input through your custom exec? Is that an i3 feature?

              • jerkface@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                5 hours ago

                why have I made that anonymous function interactive??

                Edit: Oh I think anything you bind to a key has to be interactive.

        • dezmd@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          5 hours ago

          To an extent. Early 90’s I could navigate WordPerfect in DOS faster than I’ve ever been able to work in MS Word, because it was all keyboard even before I learned proper home key 10 finger typing in high school. Technically my first word processor was Wordstar on one of those Osborne “portable” computers with the 5-inch screen when I was a young kid, but Wordperfect was what I did my first real ‘word processing’ on when I started using it for school projects. So I might just be older in that ‘how do you do fellow kids’ in this sort of discussion.

          To this day, I still prefer mc (Midnight Commander, linux flavored recreation of Norton Commander that does have a Windows port (YMMV on the win port)) to navigate filesystems for non-automated file management.

          I’ve been thoroughly conditioned for mouse use since the mid-late 90s (I call it my Warcraft-Quake era, we still used keyboard only for Doom 1/2 back in the early days), and I feel like it’s a crutch when I’m trying to do productive work instead of gaming. When I spend a few days working using remote shells, I definitely notice a speed increase. Then a few days later I lose it all again when I’m back on that mouse cursor flow brain.

          • EatATaco@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            5 hours ago

            I call it my Warcraft-Quake era, we still used keyboard only for Doom 1/2 back in the early days

            This is my main reason for not pining for the days before the mouse: it made gaming 100000x better. I remember when we first started playing quake, a lot of the guys swore by the keyboard only, until I regularly destroyed them with the mouse. . .and they all switched over.

            I’ve also done a lot of graphic design, photo-editing, schematic design, etc. . . and can’t imagine having to do that solely with the keyboard (but again, I’m often like “why isn’t there a keyboard shortcut for this?”).

            Also, when it comes to productivity, I guess it depends on what you are doing because usually my big hurdle is not how quickly I can do actions (that is usually more important in video games, tbh), the big hurdle is sitting down and thinking about how to do it correctly.

            • MutilationWave@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 hours ago

              Has the keyboard and mouse versus controller argument finally died? I mean I use a controller for things like Elden Ring and keyboard and mouse for first person or tactics/strategy games.

              We proved twenty years ago that keyboard and mouse was better for first person gaming and I was still hearing arguments that controllers were better five years ago.

            • jerkface@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              5 hours ago

              I have a game controller and a mouse. I don’t use my game controller to code. I don’t use my keyboard to sculpt. The problem isn’t that mice exist at all, its that they are overwhelmingly dominant to the point where most applications do not cater to anything else.

              • EatATaco@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 hours ago

                Now I see your original point in a new light. I just viewed it as a natural progression that the mouse would take over as the primary input because of it’s useful and intuitiveness. So when you say you “hated” this, I interpreted as a hate for mice in general and the wishing for pre-mice days. Rather than just a move back towards the keyboard being the primary interface.

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      Nah, USB-A was the best since it replaced serial ports (esp PS/2, which was much harder to plug in) and outlived/outclassed FireWire. USB-C is the best thing since HDM (screw you VGA amd DVI), which was the best since USB-A.

  • phoneymouse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    2 hours ago

    This pic leaves out the latest generation of MacBook that brings back some of those ports.

    I guess OP would rather generate outrage upvotes, rather than spread the truth.

  • narc0tic_bird@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    5 hours ago

    To be fair, USB-C, especially with Thunderbolt, is much more universal. There are adapters for pretty much every “legacy” port out there so if you really need FireWire you can have it, but it’s clear why FireWire isn’t built into the laptop itself anymore.

    The top MacBook Pro is also the 2016+ pre Apple Silicon chassis (that was also used with M chips, but sort of as a leftover), while the newer MacBook Pro chassis at least brought back HDMI and an SD card reader (and MagSafe as a dedicated charging port, although USB-C still works fine for that).

    Considering modern “docking” solutions only need a single USB-C/Thunderbolt cable for everything, these additional ports only matter when on the go. HDMI comes in handy for presentations for example.

    I’d love to see at least a single USB-A port on the MacBook Pro, but that’s likely never coming back. USB-C to A adapters exist though, so it’s not a huge deal. Ethernet can be handy as well, but most use cases for that are docked anyway.

    I like the Framework concept the most, also “only” 4 ports (on the 13" at least, plus a built-in combo jack), but using adapter cards you can configure it to whatever you need at that point in time and the cards slide into the chassis instead of sticking out like dongles would. I usually go for one USB-C/Thunderbolt on either side (so charging works on either side), a single USB-A and video out in the form of DisplayPort or HDMI. Sometimes I swap the video out (that also works via USB-C obviously) for Ethernet, even though the Ethernet card sticks out. For a (retro) LAN party, I used 1 USB-C, USB-A (with a 4-port hub for wired peripherals), DisplayPort and Ethernet.

    • MutilationWave@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I use an in-house tool to connect to equipment over Ethernet for the company my company contracts for. Built in Ethernet is so good for it and getting very hard to find. When it was time for a new laptop my boss was able to find a decent one with built in Ethernet. I even offered to pay the difference in price.

      I used two USB dongles in the past and it seems like they worked when they wanted to. It’s most likely a software issue because the in-house tool is garbage.

      • narc0tic_bird@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Recommendation would be to use a Thunderbolt Ethernet adapter so it can directly connect via PCI Express. These USB Ethernet dongles are often crappy.