OK, maybe you wouldn’t pay three grand for a Project DIGITS PC. But what about a $1,000 Blackwell PC from Acer, Asus, or Lenovo?


Besides, why not use native Linux as the primary operating system on this new chip family? Linux, after all, already runs on the Grace Blackwell Superchip. Windows doesn’t. It’s that simple.

Nowadays, Linux runs well with Nvidia chips. Recent benchmarks show that open-source Linux graphic drivers work with Nvidia GPUs as well as its proprietary drivers.

Even Linus Torvalds thinks Nvidia has gotten its open-source and Linux act together. In August 2023, Torvalds said, “Nvidia got much more involved in the kernel. Nvidia went from being on my list of companies who are not good to my list of companies who are doing really good work.”

  • Telorand@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    84
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 days ago

    Nowadays, Linux runs well with Nvidia chips. Recent benchmarks show that open-source Linux graphic drivers work with Nvidia GPUs as well as its proprietary drivers.

    No, they’re not, and I wish people would stop repeating this. If you want to do anything in userspace, it’s still proprietary, Nouveau, or NVK, the second of which has never been comparable and the third of which is still in development (though showing a lot of promise). What is basically at feature parity is the kernel drivers, which if the author had read their source, they’d already know. Kernelspace ≠ Userspace.

    However, I will agree that even with the proprietary driver, most people will have a comparable experience to anyone with an AMD card. Hell, I can even use my old laptop with an integrated 960M to play the same games it has always been able to play. Linux has become more available to more people than ever, and it’s only going to continue to get better.

    • verdare [he/him]@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      2 days ago

      I can only speak from personal experience, but NVIDIA with Wayland has been an absolute mess. My system seems to be stable right now, but there are still weird graphical glitches and artifacts when running games through WINE. Every third or fourth driver update seems to break something.

      Also, I’d generally be skeptical of claims that the drivers work well due to “benchmarks.” A benchmark isn’t going to tell you that, for example, certain window elements fail to render entirely until you drag the mouse over them, at which point they suddenly flicker in.

      • Telorand@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        As with anything, YMMV. I’m curious why you’re running games through Wine though. Proton seems to be the better option for gaming.

        • Cethin@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          18 hours ago

          I’m pretty sure the “correct” way to say it is “WINE with Proton.” You can’t run Proton alone. It’s an addition to WINE. Some people will just leave off either, and we all generally know what they mean, but if you’re being pedantic you need to say both, not just Proton.

        • verdare [he/him]@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          2 days ago

          I use Proton for Steam and Bottles for everything else. I was using WINE as a catchall term, since all of these technologies are fundamentally built on top of it.

          • Cethin@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            18 hours ago

            Odds are you’re using Proton in Bottles too, or Heroic/Lutris. You’re using WINE for both though, including when using Proton.

          • Telorand@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 days ago

            Gotcha. I figured that was the case, but I didn’t want to assume, since they’re not technically synonymous.

      • SitD@lemy.lol
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        i had a terrible experience too but this is with laptop mind you.

        since people are often saying nvidia is just fine I’m starting to believe my problem is the mux switching and not even the gpu itself… but since I’m not an expert i can’t be sure…

    • Cris@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      3 days ago

      As someone who doesn’t follow this stuff closely, I appreciate the clarification!

      Its nice to hear from someone with more hands on experience. Hope you have a good one :)

    • suoko@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      This is dedicate to some specific tasks, we’ll all probably continue to use online chat bots

  • xavier666@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    > Checks title

    > Checks community name

    We just had a flashpoint, right?

  • hallettj@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    3 days ago

    Yes, Microsoft now offers Windows on ARM (WoA). However, WoA is not a first-class citizen in the Windows world. Many Windows programs won’t run natively on WoA […]. In particular, Windows games run poorly on ARM.

    Interesting news! Sadly I imagine Windows games on Linux on ARM won’t perform any better than on WoA. But maybe this will be more incentive for game developers to ship ARM builds.

      • hallettj@leminal.space
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        It would be great if there were a way to translate x86 binaries for ARM without emulation. Has Valve found some way to do that? From a bit of searching I see they’ve been testing games on ARM, and that testing involves a version of Proton/Wine that runs on ARM. But it looks to me like they’re testing with ARM binaries for those games?

        I’m as enthusiastic as anyone about more Linux usage, and I agree that Linux support for ARM is a good selling point. But the reason Linux works so well on ARM is that we use all this open-source software that anyone can compile for ARM. I don’t think it’s honest to point to closed-source software that we can’t recompile, and imply that it will work better on Linux because other software runs natively on ARM on Linux.

    • tiddy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 days ago

      Can’t speak for any other distro but android’s winulator (under the hood wine and box64/86) runs pretty well

    • sparky@lemmy.federate.cc@lemmy.federate.cc
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Running x86 games under Rosetta on Apple Silicon has been super playable for me, both Intel Mac binaries and Windows games under WINE. So I don’t see why it wouldn’t be possible on Linux or Windows, assuming they spend enough time and care writing the translation layer.

      • hallettj@leminal.space
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        I’m sorry, I wasn’t completely clear. Yes you can run games on ARM on any OS with an emulator. When I said “won’t run any better” I meant you’ll get the same emulation slowdown on Linux as on Windows.

        The point of the article is that stuff runs faster on Linux because you don’t need an emulator, and it implies that that includes games. That’s disingenuous because any games that require emulation on Windows will also require emulation on Linux. If there’s no ARM build, there’s no ARM build.

  • john89@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    3 days ago

    Sure would be nice to not have to prepend my programs with prime-run in order to use the dedicated GPU on laptops.