• El Barto@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    10 个月前

    That would border too close to government censorship, though. I hate this guy’s posts as mixhtas the next person, but full restriction should apply if he keeps breaching previous agreements only.

    Having said that, I hope he does breach this one.

      • treefrog@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        10 个月前

        When and if he’s convicted.

        If the judge goes to far before he’s convicted the right is going to scream about first amendment rights.

        I’m sure they’re already screaming about it tbh. But they’d have more ammunition if the judge limits him before he’s convicted.

        • CADmonkey@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 个月前

          Well we better not hurt the feelings of the people who are perpetuating all of this, that would be mean.

      • pips@lemmy.film
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        10 个月前

        Kevin Mitnick was convicted. Trump is not yet convicted.

    • snooggums@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      10 个月前

      Since he has breached previous agreements already I think we are to the taking away all his electronics step.

      Or we would in a just society.

      • keeb420@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        10 个月前

        or maybe he could be held in custody if he cant not break the law. like you or i would be if we were intimidating witnesses and judges.