Summary

Minnesota Governor Tim Walz, Kamala Harris’ 2024 running mate, has suggested he may run for president in 2028.

Reflecting on the Democrats’ loss to Donald Trump and JD Vance, he admitted: “A large number of people did not believe we were fighting for them in the last election – and that’s the big disconnect.”

Walz said his life experience, rather than ambition, would guide his decision.

Though his VP campaign was marred by gaffes, he remains open to running if he feels prepared.

    • samus12345@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      51
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      12 hours ago

      There will, but it won’t be a fair one. They have “elections” in Russia, too.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        66
        ·
        14 hours ago

        I remember Republicans checking out on elections back in 2018 because they bought hard into the Trump “elections are rigged” propaganda. The GOP lost seven Senate seats that year as conservative turnout plunged.

        I wonder if Democrats will make the same mistake in 2026.

        • unphazed@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Shouldn’t be hard. All they have to say is “Remember the townhalls, and how they mocked you while you paid for them to make your lives worse? We’ll put it back.” They don’t even need to add anything, just try to rebuild. Anything would be a positive change when you’re sliding into the negative side of the scale (and in two years, it’ll be far far far to the left)

        • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          47
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          13 hours ago

          No, I don’t think Democrats are ready to make new mistakes yet. They still won’t abandon their devotion to the old mistakes.

        • BoofStroke@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          11 hours ago

          They made it in 2024. The results of abstaining or protest voting were obvious, and these idiots did it anyway. And here we are.

          • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            9 hours ago

            The results of abstaining or protest voting were obvious

            Absolutely. The current Dem leadership is now wildly unpopular and vulnerable to primary. Just like after 2016, the seeds have been planted for a big anti-incumbent wave.

        • Ech@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          14 hours ago

          Not sure about rigged, but honestly, depending on how the next few years go, it may be straight up dangerous for non-republican Americans to vote. While that’s by no means a certainty, people should keep an eye on any electoral changes made in their state.

          • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            23
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            14 hours ago

            If Republicans experience a route like they suffered in 2018, it will likely be due to the mushy indie republican-when-its-convenient voters breaking ranks in droves, just like they did in prior Dem wave years. That’s what Harris was banking on in 2024 when she paraded around her pet RINOs Liz Cheney and Jeff Flake. She just failed to understand that these wishy-washy voters are chasing less war and less disruption and more protectionist economics, something Trump was able to dangle over their heads (twice!) to win the GOP primary / national election.

            Republicans don’t really seem to get it, either. Which is why they think the midterm after a wave year is the perfect time to put Grade A psychos all over the down-ballots and end up losing statewide in Alabama of all places as a result.

            The “we won’t be having any more elections” crowd is heavily invested in a theory that Republicans can get their own base to sit down, shut up, and follow orders. But the last eight years of Trump should be an indication of the exact opposite. The party is being lead by the base, which means the prior generation’s power brokers like the Bushs and Cheneys and Bloombergs no longer have a place in it.

            • Laereht@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              13 hours ago

              This line of thinking has preserved whatever is left of my optimism. Let us hope my fellow Americans continue to function predictably.

        • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 hours ago

          I wonder if Democrats will make the same mistake in 2026.

          i really, really fucking hope this doesnt happen, i’m going to fucking lose my shit if it does. Because unless things change, it’s not looking great for the trump midterms right now.

        • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          13 hours ago

          Democrats will make the same mistake in 2026.

          The only thing the Democrats failed at was fielding a fat old white male felon narcissist serial rapist with ties to a foreign nation-state. If they can just do that they’ll win no matter what.

          Sorry if you didn’t get a personal hug from America’s Mom and Dad but yoire kinda expected to make a value judgement between two options and choose the best. As a group, you did not.

          Only blame Dems who voted for a kleptocratic felon. The rest did their best to field the best candidate they could and lost to a traitor – and those guys need to start with our apology for being stupid, same as all of Ukraine, and next Moldova.

          • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            12 hours ago

            The only thing the Democrats failed at was fielding a fat old white male felon narcissist serial rapist with ties to a foreign nation-state.

            Is that why Obama lost in 2008?

      • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Look, guys. I’m rather concerned that the states that haven’t seceded by then won’t even have electricity anymore.

    • TimLovesTech (AuDHD)(he/him)@badatbeing.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 hours ago

      The one thing we have going for us is that Don’s dementia and age are going to increasingly make it difficult for him to hold his party together. And there is the chance one of those things will leave the GOP trying to field a new traitor to try and get the cult to consolidate around.

      • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        9 hours ago

        once he kicks the bucket, assuming they can’t find someone the republican base will support as fervently as trump, the entire party is done for, it will collapse into a blackhole of nothingness.

    • rumba@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      14 hours ago

      There will absolutely be an election.

      It will be a farce, a Russian election where there’s only one possibility to win.

      If we’re not pitchforks in the street before then, I don’t hold much hope

      • Hubi@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Or maybe a Hungary-style election where the entire media landscape shills for the ruling class and people on social media are bombarded with misinformation and one-sided reporting.

    • maplebar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      States run the elections, so I’m positive there will be one. But whether or not the results are respected… I’m not so confident in that.

      • samus12345@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        12 hours ago

        I’m not confident the results in red states will be accurate to begin with.

    • Jolly Platypus@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      14 hours ago

      There will be since elections are held at the state level. Many won’t be free or fair in the red states, but they’ll be good in the blue states.

      If red states don’t hold elections, that’s fewer electoral college votes we need to win the presidency and we wouldn’t win in red states anyway.

      Please, Texas and Florida. Oh, please, don’t hold elections. 🙏

      • dhork@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        13 hours ago

        The way I read it, electoral college votes are the one thing where individual states can somewhat easily cancel elections for President, as long as they do so before the election. States have broad discretion over the appointment of electors. All states currently appoint them based on the results of elections, but the rules around that are all set by State legislation, and can be reset by States as well. The only Federal requirement is that the rules don’t change after any election is held.

        Prior Supreme Courts have ruled that things like the Equal Protection clause may be used to challenge any act where the legislature restricts voting rights once they have been granted. But who knows what this clown Court would make of that.

        Congressional elections, on the other hand, must be held in order for those seats to be filled. So any state that unilaterally cancels elections across the board will be sending nobody to Congress (and likely any expired Senate terms as well). Some states may go the extra mile and cancel the election for President, but not for Congress. We’ll see how that turns out.

    • Dogsoftulkas@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Nah, there probably will. Whoever is taking control of the US really don’t care about MAGA’s and 3rd terms. They’ll just put another puppet there, the new way of doing things in post-capitalism still maintains and some people will continue to get increasingly very rich doesn’t matter who the prez is. We finally reached “the future”.

    • tyrant@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      14 hours ago

      There will definitely be an attempt to eliminate or “postpone” them. I’m certain Trump is looking at Putin in power and other governments in a state of war without elections as inspiration.