They were invented decades ago.

They have fewer moving parts than wheelbois.

They require less maintenance.

There’s obviously some bottleneck in expanding maglev technology, but what is it?

  • BarqsHasBite@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    One of the most common flights is US west coast to east coast. Normal high speed rail can’t do this in a reasonable time frame. We need something faster if we want to get reduce those flights.

    One of the features of capitalism is externalizing the costs, especially of pollution.

    • howrar@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Ah, that makes sense. So maglev is overall cheaper but still less profitable because the costs are paid where they’re incurred.

      • BarqsHasBite@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Cheaper than flights? You’d have to do the math on it. We may have to accept that some things like travel will be expensive. But right now it’s not feasible Wrt to time to take a train or even HSR coast to coast.