Sixty-three percent of Americans say a third U.S. political party is needed, up from 56% a year ago and by one percentage point the highest in Gallup's 20-year trend.

Story Highlights

  • Third time support has exceeded 60%, along with 2017 and 2021
  • Republicans primarily behind the increase, with 58% now in favor
  • Political independents remain group most likely to favor third party
  • player2@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
    445·
    1 year ago

    If only the politicians in the dominant parties had any incentive to make elections fair for all parties. As it stands, the dominant parties have too many systems in place to give themselves advantages.

    Rank choice voting seems like an obvious upgrade to our current voting system but is nowhere to be found other than a couple states.

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.worldEnglish
      142·
      1 year ago

      Rank choice voting seems like an obvious upgrade to our current voting system but is nowhere to be found other than a couple states.

      Because the two “private parties” have an insane amount of control over our political system.

      And both of them count on getting a large amount of votes because people hate the other side.

      If there’s literally any viable third option it fucks their system up, which would take power away from the people leading those private organizations

      For example, say a far right party shows up. That hurts republicans, but it means Dems would win in landslides. Once that happens, Dem voters are going to start demanding things get done. Which means we’re suddenly going to have more Manchin’s voting against the party. Leading to increased primary challenges and maybe even a viable progressive party.

      Both parties have a bunch of reasons to keep the status quo

    • Pennomi@lemmy.worldEnglish
      12·
      1 year ago

      There’s like 12 imperfect voting systems that are still light years better than our current system. I wish we would just pick one and roll with it already, even if it’s a temporary fix.

      • fubo@lemmy.world
        161·
        1 year ago

        Approval voting is mathematically sane, rewards candidates that are broadly acceptable rather than extremists, and is easy to explain to voters: “Vote for every candidate whom you would be okay with.”

        Candidates get more votes by building big tents than fanatical bases; voters maximize their power by honestly representing their views, and (unlike IRV) there’s no case where thinking better of a candidate will lead you to vote in a way that causes that candidate to lose.

      • player2@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
        3·
        1 year ago

        I believe the only reason a “crazy second choice” exists is because we have such limited options to choose from when voting.

        With rank choice voting, more candidates could run within a party without competing for votes because you would be able to vote for all of your favorite people in order without worrying what party they fall into.

        We could vote for people we like instead of voting to avoid the person we hate.

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.worldEnglish
        32·
        1 year ago

        But also? We already more or less have that. Both major parties (I think also most of the “independent” parties?) have a primary where party members can select the nominee from those running

        Those are a formality…

        There is no law that would force a party to run the person who won their primary.

        After the last couple of years, I struggle to understand how people think that’s “good enough”.