• RealFknNito@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    105
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    You know we fucked up when in order to enact oversight on a branch of government we need to ask for their consent first.

    • VikingHippie@lemmy.wtf
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      39
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is just an aside, but I love how oversight means making sure mistakes/abuses don’t happen too much but also means mistake 😄

    • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Are you…talking about the proposed term limits? Because that’s purely legislative, there’s no need to ask permission from the justices.

      • frezik
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’d have to pass constitutional muster. Usually, it’s hard for one branch of government to impose restrictions on another branch of government without a constitutional amendment. It’d end up in front of the Supreme Court to decide if they would accept that restriction or not.

        One of the reasons increasing the size of the Supreme Court comes up as a solution is because Congress is explicitly allowed to just do that.