• RealFknNito@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Lol you’re the one contributing to making it worse. Google already loses money on operating YouTube and freeloaders only exacerbate that loss. They’re going to make ads longer, unskippable, and take away your perception of a choice. They’re going to kill every other option you have. Pay or stop watching.

      • sour@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        it was worse before i started blocking ads

        look what you made me do

        pay or stop watching

        no

        • RealFknNito@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Pay or stop watching isn’t the choice I’m putting in front of you.

          It’s the one YouTube is winding up to put in front of you. Good luck.

          • sour@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            you made it look like that

            youtube is winding up to put in front of you

            will they send police if i keep blocking ads

      • redcalcium@lemmy.institute
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Normally I’d agree with you, but this is Google, the 4th largest companies in the world, not some scrappy startup which might go away next quarter if they can’t hit their revenue target. If Google actually shutdown YouTube, I’d cheer because that’s when the real competition begun in the video space.

        • RealFknNito@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Right, so only scrappy startups deserve to run a profitable business and Google should be forced to choke down the abhorrent cost of YouTube out of… what exactly? If they were making money hand over fist on it, sure, fuck em. But they’re not. YouTube isn’t profitable and the reason there aren’t competitors is for that exact reason. They are literally free video data storage with no limit. No site can compete with that. Everything else would make you pay for a membership or have a small hard limit or even have some kind of gate yet you take it as the standard.

          If YouTube fails there will be no alternative to take their place. Amazon might try, but their greed might stop them. They’re already a household name, what would the point be?

          • redcalcium@lemmy.institute
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            The thing is, I’m ok if Google do this right from the start. Instead, they use their massive capitals to run YouTube for free and squashed all their competitors. Vimeo was the most promising competitor in this space, but they can’t compete with Google’s infinite subsidy to YouTube and had to pivot. Now that there is no competitor around anymore, Google jacked up prices, reduced monetization rates for their content creators, locked up formerly free features behind subscription plans, and now declaring a war with adblockers.

            If YouTube fails there will be no alternative to take their place.

            So yeah, I’m not supporting Google in this space because this whole situation where there is no competitors to YouTube anymore is Google’s own doing.