For me I would hold the social media companies more to account when it comes to hate speech and harassment online and force social media companies to do more to stop online harassment and hate speech.

  • Dyskolos@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Did you forgot what the initial post was I replied to? That censoring hate-speech IS cancel-culture. But you referring me to some nazi-forums (I assume they are considering the title) because I’m for free speech? Not even considering how restrictive Nazis usually are, you can’t even be non-white to speak. Totally makes sense. Not. I’m for free speech since the internet was born. If you’re really not 12 you might remember the ribbon-banners later on. It just died. Free speech is dead. We’re even at a point where billionaires buy a platform that spreads shit they don’t like and change it.

    • Martin Kelly@infosec.exchange
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      @Dyskolos no. i’m referring you to stormfront because it’s both the trivial and irrefutable rebuttal to your nonsense argument, and because it’s funny. i do recall the original post. i also recall your last post. i mention this only because apparently you don’t as you keep on being confused by my addressing it

        • Martin Kelly@infosec.exchange
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          @darq @Dyskolos “reductio ad riduculum” doesn’t mean what you think it means. if i could give you a helpful tip, using latin to try and appear smarter than you are often backfires. as in this case. “you used a formal logic technique to disprove my point so i quit” is not the slam dunk rebuttal you seem to think it is. That said, gonna tap out now. battle of wits with a clearly unarmed opponent isn’t sporting