CHEF-KOCH@lemmy.ml to Linux@lemmy.ml · edit-23 years agoLess Than 10% of Firefox Users on Linux Are Running Waylandwww.phoronix.comexternal-linkmessage-square27fedilinkarrow-up120arrow-down10file-text
arrow-up120arrow-down1external-linkLess Than 10% of Firefox Users on Linux Are Running Waylandwww.phoronix.comCHEF-KOCH@lemmy.ml to Linux@lemmy.ml · edit-23 years agomessage-square27fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareEchedenyan@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up4·edit-23 years agoIs not OBS working on Wayland yet?
minus-squareEvan@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up1·3 years agoNot positive about OBS, it’s mostly support in software I use
minus-squareEchedenyan@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up0·3 years agoWhat do you mean by “not positive” and what is the relation with that you support it or not? You mean that is not your kind of software since you didn’t have a positive experience with it and because of that you don’t support it?
minus-squarekeegomatic@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up0·3 years ago“Not positive” in this context means “unsure” (i.e., the above commenter is unsure about whether or not OBS works in Wayland or not, but they rely on some other software which they know is incompatible with Wayland)
minus-squareEchedenyan@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up1·3 years agoThank you for the explanation. I am not familiar with that kind of expression.
Is not OBS working on Wayland yet?
Not positive about OBS, it’s mostly support in software I use
What do you mean by “not positive” and what is the relation with that you support it or not?
You mean that is not your kind of software since you didn’t have a positive experience with it and because of that you don’t support it?
“Not positive” in this context means “unsure” (i.e., the above commenter is unsure about whether or not OBS works in Wayland or not, but they rely on some other software which they know is incompatible with Wayland)
Thank you for the explanation.
I am not familiar with that kind of expression.