• Ekky@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    113
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    So, in short:

    • Google is not killing ad blockers, but merely chopping off both legs and arms in the name of security.
    • ublock Origin is implementing a lite version for chromium browsers, supposedly being pretty decent given the circumstances.
    • Old Manifest V2 extensions will be disabled in June 2024 and Manifest V2 will be removed in June 2025.
    • Firefox is Firefox.
    • Privacy and security focused chromium based browsers will have to implement proper native ad blocking.
  • Kumabear@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    107
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I am now using Firefox…

    I mean I was using Firefox before this, but I also am now as well you know.

      • teft@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        111
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Switching to what? Firefox. I don’t see the problem here. Install Firefox and forget those monopolistic enshitifying fucks.

        • Aceticon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          1 year ago

          I went from Netscape to Mozzila and from Mozilla to Firefox and, guess what… my browser never fucked me up in the name of maximizing corporate profits.

          Google was already a wholly untrustworth Ad Company With A Tech Arm back when they invented Chrome, and shit like this was already back then a question of WHEN, not IF.

        • Teknikal@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          My recommendation is librefox and if you really want a chrome based alternative I’d suggest Thorium (although I don’t know what thorium will do when this is implemented I’m hoping they don’t follow it.)

      • ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        36
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        For anyone interested, as of November 2023:

        Web browsers using Gecko (Firefox’s engine): GNU IceCat, Waterfox, K-Meleon, Lunascape, Portable Firefox, Conkeror, Classilla, TenFourFox. Edit: and Fennec

        Web browsers using the Goanna engine (which is a fork of Gecko): Pale Moon, Basilisk.

        Flow is a web browser with its own proprietary browser engine.

        The other active engines listed are: WebKit (Apple’s engine), and Blink (Google’s engine, which they forked off of WebKit, and which is used for Chrome, Chromium, and countless other browsers).

        • Dojan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’d no idea there’s a browser called Conkeror. That’s prertty funny since WebKit was based off of KHTML used in KDE’s Konqueror browser.

        • wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          I use firefox, but Id never head of these alternatives.

          Anyone who does have reviews? Pros, cons, reasons to use them beside variety?

          • krakenx@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Pale Moon still supports the even older extension model. I used it briefly until my extensions got updated to the newer format. I still kinda miss the old theme engine.

        • Blorper59@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I thought it was pronounced Kay Melly-on, so I never tried it because of the silly name.

          Pihole will be unaffected.

      • helenslunch@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Every other Google Chromium fork will need to maintain an increasingly complex set of changes to the Google repository

        Yet infinitely easier than building a new browser from the bottom up

          • helenslunch@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            I hear people say Chromium is bad for the web all the time but they all seem to think that Chromium = Chrome.

                • Evilcoleslaw@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Because using Chromium and Chromium-based browsers reinforces Chrome’s market share dominance which will harm comparability as more and more sites will only be tested against Chrome and in many cases refuse to serve pages to other browsers without user agent string fuckery.

                  It also cultivates dependence on Google for the extension ecosystem, etc

        • Cralex@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I was using Firefox back when it was cool. And now it’ll be cool again.

            • El Barto@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              I briefly lived in the dark side of IE6 because AOL fucked over the Netscape browser so badly. But then I came back like the prodigal son when Firefox (then Firebird) came along.

              • legios@aussie.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                Yeah I remember IE5 and NS4, as well as the Firebird/Phoenix/Firefox naming joys back in the day.

                If you want to blow your brains out, try getting XHTML 1.1 working in IE6. It is indeed possible if you modify the XHTML DTD. Interestingly it’d render shit so much better since it’d use MSXML instead of Trident as the rendering engine. Sadly it would add about 400k to the page since it needed to load a custom DTD…

  • holdthecheese@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 year ago

    Interesting that article comes to the conclusion that uBlockOrigin Lite is basically as effective as the original and works on the new Manifest v3.

    • miridius@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m glad you read the article, since it seems like nobody else in the comment section has!

  • pirat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    When I went to read the comments of this post, and for some reason it took 10 sec for them to show up in my client, I thought of Google…

  • Hoptrain@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I am forever grateful for my father having Firefox installed on the xp hand-me-down that became my first computer