I believe more and more people will escape to lemmy sooner or later, and I already see 3 different communities for the same thing (selfhosted) here on lemmy. Time will tell which one will be the most active, but lets assume all of them will be equally active and the desire emerges to combine the two communities about the same thing, is that something possible or intended to be possible with federated services?

  • DudePluto@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 year ago

    Eh, reddit really isn’t much better in this department. It’s not uncommon for multiple subs to exist for the same userbase (r/memes vs r/dankmemes, r/christian vs r/truechristian). Over time users figure out which is which, which is the main one, and which is for them

    • SafetyGoggles@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      True, but they are all with different names, and they are not completely the same (as in different rules, more specific topic vs general topic, etc). But on Lemmy there is a possibility that two communities having the same exact topic and name for example !technology@beehaw.org and !technology@lemmy.ml, they are both discussing technology (and not any specific difference between them).

      • Ada@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 year ago

        @SafetyGoggles The difference between those two is the moderation policies of the instance. Beehaw doesn’t federate with the same instances that lemmy.ml does, and has an explicitly more inclusive and less generalist approach. They both cover the same ground, but you couldn’t just merge them.

        Having said that, it would be nice to see a user level feature that lets end users combine communities in to one “virtual” community in their interface.

        @g7s @DudePluto

        • SafetyGoggles@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yep, that’s exactly what I mean. Coverung the same ground, but they are different communities with different moderation, so it can’t be merged, but it make sense to group them together and view it as a “playlist”. Just like Whitney Houston and ABBA don’t collaborate to make albums, but it make sense for their songs to exist together in a playlist called “Songs from the 80s”.

        • wesley_cook@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          The down side of that would probably be duplicated content. Like if some major news happens for a topic reposts can already be really annoying and usually need moderator action to combine threads. Then there’d be that times however many communities exist for that same topic.

          • CHOPSTEEQ@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            As another pointed out, that already happens. It’s even preferable, to some. For example, I had a programming multi reddit with JavaScript and several more focused JS related subs in it. Seeing the same link or topic in multiple subs often let me get more viewpoints to consider. Outside of the web, journalism outfits all publish Associated Press articles. If you follow multiple news outlets you’ll see the same story that way as well.

            To me, it’s just natural.