• Waluigis_Talking_Buttplug@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is why I supported a Tarantino Star Trek, to forever tarnish the brand with violence and language so much that Disney would be afraid to add it to their monolithic catalog of IPs

  • driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I used to work as an assistant editor for Fox Channel in Argentina many many years ago. And there was this trailer for a star trek movie that had the name on text of the crew on the trailer and the scriptwriter wrote “Zulu” instead of Sulu in the script (my knowledge about star trek is limited to the memes of this community) so I complied and wrote Zulu on the trailer. Nobody else notice and was aired like that. the next day it aired some guy I have never seen on my life entered my island with my producer and the screenwriter and the guy was furious, asking me why I wrote the name wrong and telling me that they had been receiving calls from all latinamerica saying thay we were fucking stupid and had to pull off the trailer from air. I show him the script as it came to me in the email and the screenwriter facepalmed in shame. They asked me to correct the name and re send the traileds asap. After thay I learned thay the guy was like the director of costumers relationship and the poor screenwriter was demoted and transferred to write the trailer of the cooking channel.

    • FoolishBrainiac@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      *directed two Star Trek movies.

      Beyond was directed by Justin Lin which is why it was better than the JJ movies

    • TeenieBopper@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      I mean, the first one was a fun popcorn flick. Into Darkness was… Eh, not the worst movie I’ve ever seen. I can’t adequately judge Beyond because it came out about three months after my dad died (who introduced me to Trek and sci-fi in general) and he would have loved the ending.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        My dad was a film historian, and there have been so many discoveries and so much movie news he would have loved to know about since he died. I think about that every time something new in the classic movie world comes up.

  • radix@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    1 year ago

    Must go faster? She can’t take much more of this, Captain. I’ve got a bad feeling about this.

    • Doug [he/him]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      You mean the Disney that conservative groups got mad at because two women had a split second “kiss” in a movie, or the Disney that made Song of the South?

      • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 year ago

        Or the Disney that didn’t let the cops be gay in Gravity Falls, or the Disney that doesn’t let gays in Pixar films, or the Disney that relegated Finn to a minor character for being black

        • Doug [he/him]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          Didn’t watch Gravity Falls but as far as I knew they were confirmed gay, admittedly in the finale.

          There was also a gay cop in Onward

          I also don’t agree that Finn was a minor character, he was a regular focal point in two movies much to the annoyance of the same conservative groups.

          I’m by no means suggesting Disney is anywhere in the neighborhood of acceptable. Gay characters have a tendency to be tiny roles or unpromoted movies (I watch a lot of movies and I hadn’t seen anything for Strange World before it released). I’m just saying “never” is probably inaccurate for modern Disney.

          • DroneRights [it/its]@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            The problem is that in theory Finn is a main character with a complex arc and a love interest of all three of the other main characters. But in practice, his arc is never fully explored, and because Disney hates gays and interracial relationships, they decided to put Rey with the Klan incel, invent a straight love interest out of nowhere for Poe, and write Rose out of the story, giving Finn the black former slave a black former slave girlfriend as a consolation prize.

    • nxdefiant@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Misters Chekov Do you want the Disney-owned, AI generated force ghost of Anton Yelchin to show up? Because THIS FAR AND NO FURTHER.

      • Jesus_666@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        Misters Chekov Do you want the Disney-owned, AI generated force ghost of Anton Yelchin to show up?

        Beverly Crusher would.

        • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Why do we give Crusher so much shit for her ghostly dalliance, but Yar gets off scott free, when she had full on sex with an android that was only a couple months old from his perspective?

          And don’t tell me that it’s because Rick Berman showed up on set in his true form to kill her off.

    • Blackmist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      What, so they can lock it behind the Star Trek Plus channel, just 4.99 a month on top of Amazon Prime.

      Now with extra targeted adverts!