I’ll go first. I’ve used a lot of search engines, I used duckduckgo for quite some time but found their search results kinda bad. I’m currently using ecosia the search results are similar to ddg’s but at least I’m planting trees, so there’s that.

  • hllywluis@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    Ever since Bing introduced their AI stuff I’ve been trialing it + Edge on my main computer. It’s not so bad but sometimes I do need to use Google to actually find what I’m looking for. Currently using Google on everything else though. The AI stuff is actually pretty good but I feel like if Google makes their implementation more widespread most people are just going to use that vs Bing.

  • Phil L.@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    Ecosia on my tablet because of nice integrated browser and DuckDuck+Firefox on the PC

    Am also checking out Brave on PC at the moment

  • Kissaki@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    DuckDuckGo

    I also use Firefox search bookmarks for searching specific sites.

    Search Bookmark: You prepare the URL with a %s placeholder and give the bookmark a tag, and you can type tag searchterm and it’ll open it.

    I’m using it for opening word definitions, word translations, searching reference documentation, searching specific platforms/websites/media types, etc.

  • Perturbee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    I’ve been using presearch.com and and quite happy with the results it gives for any question. Yes, there are one or two sponsored links, but the rest consists of great results

      • noodlejetski@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        yup. or rather their short form, !g and !a in your example, because no one’s got time to type out the entire names (:

      • teoria@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        It can literally use any search engine you think of as a backend, so its strictly higher quality? Unless thats what you meant

      • darcmage@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        Isn’t that hard to determine without specifying which engines are used in your chosen instance? Searx/Searng has provided superior results for me using a combination of engines compared to anything provided by any of the alternatives by themselves.

  • Steve@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    I hate adds. I was using Neeva. Just switched to Kagi. After nearly 3 weeks, it looks like 300 searches/month will work for me. So $5 a month is fine.

  • nullishcat@lemmy.fmhy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    Kagi. Yes, it’s paid and the pricing structure is really meh, but:

    • Actual privacy
    • No BS like with DDG
    • AI features (like a “quick answer” feature that’s really useful)
    • Has its own index along with others
    • Search results are great, probably better than DDG’s
    • “Lenses” (basically narrow results by a set of sites)
    • Devs are pretty cool
    • smoke_bird@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      I’ve been using Kagi for a few months now and I love it. When I think about how much of my life revolves around accurate information, the price is negligible.

    • DengueDucky@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      I want to give it a try but it’s hard to justify the cost with limited searches. I don’t want to have to keep track of how many times I’ve searched or second guess if I “really need to search for that”.

    • bit@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      Kagi is absolutely wonderful. Highly recommend giving it ago. Gives me better results than google while having a fair privacy policy

    • Rick@thesimplecorner.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      For some reason the thought of a paid search engine has never even crossed by mind before. I’ve been using DDG but this has peaked my curiosity. Thank you.

      Edit: The pricing is… very… meh.

    • Nina@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      I was using DuckDuckGo and it was giving me pretty ‘eh’ results, only marginally better than google on the surface level, but both weren’t really usable for deep older searches. (and ddg starting to add sus ads/promoted) Brave is better, but Kagi has been fantastic when I’ve really needed to find something specific, technical, or very old. I think the best way to come about the pricing structure and limited search results is that I think it’s not supposed to be your only search engine from then on. There are times when you need what kagi gives in terms of producing quality and relevant results, and times you just wanna search “[company name] reviews/is a scam?” that using kagi wouldn’t serve you better than anything else, so it’s more of a tool that you bring out when you aren’t finding what you need with free search engines. On it’s own page it doesn’t try and oversell you on it, they admit that the majority of people don’t need paid search most of the time.

      I haven’t approached if it’s an early netflix thing where you could split the bill with others for one login/family plan, that might make it more feasible.

    • Pumpkin@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      I didn’t know it was privacy focused or that they were building their own index, that’s really cool. Do you think it’s worth the money?

      • zarquon@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        It’s only a few bucks a month. I think so.

        The only thing I don’t like is needing to be logged in to search. That always feels like a huge invasion of privacy. The at least claim that they don’t log search contents though

      • nullishcat@lemmy.fmhy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        Bit biased cause I’ve had it for a while and have a ‘legacy plan’. But even without that, absolutely.

    • pineapple@lemmy.pineapplemachine.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      Kagi. Yes, it’s paid and the pricing structure is really meh, but:

      Huh. I hadn’t heard of this one before, but I think I’m going to have to try it out.

  • t0fr@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    DDG, it works well enough for me, and not that I got used to bangs I cannot let go of them

  • Rats@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    Duckduckgo for the most part, especially if I already know where I want to get to. Google as a backup like others are saying.

    • saluer_lorque
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      Started out with Ecosia and switched to Qwant for privacy. It had the best balance of privacy and usability for my threat model.

  • Lyfja@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    Duckduckgo, works like I want it to and it’s not Google. Never had a problem with its search results either. Tried several others as well including searx and ecosia but I found their image search inferior to ddg’s.

    • mrmanager@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      Kagi is better though. I was using ddg for a long time but had to use Google now and then to get good results.