• Rapidcreek@reddthat.comOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    105
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    7 months ago

    Voluntarily passing up an opportunity to lie, bloviate, ax-grind, spleen-vent and obfuscate before a national audience? To play (paper-thin) ‘tough guy’ before his degenerate maga-head cult crowd?

    Something’s really off here…

      • pelespirit@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        7 months ago

        He may lose a lot of his hotels and maybe even Maralago over this, he’s nervous and going to get even more crazy talking soon.

      • Dantpool@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        28
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        If he loses the trial, he’ll blame the lawyer that didn’t want him to testify, and claim they were part of the deep state.

        It’s also extremely disheartening that I had to say, “If he loses” and that I have no faith in our justice system anymore.

        • HopeOfTheGunblade@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          21
          ·
          7 months ago

          He already lost. Summary judgement at the outset. At this point, it’s just about how badly he lost. And Engoron does not appear to be a fan of his behavior.

    • athos77@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      7 months ago

      Nah, he can do that outside on the courtroom steps without even risking perjury charges.

    • SPRUNT@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 months ago

      Testifying is under oath, so bloviating like he does can result in actual consequences.

      That’s my guess, anyway.

      • orcrist@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        As he already learned in other defamation cases, you don’t have to be under oath to say things that will cost you a lot of money. But when you’re under oath, the potential consequences are larger.

        • nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          He’d constantly be on the phone to news max, Fox, and Oann. No need to bother with an incoherent book.

  • Veedem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    77
    ·
    7 months ago

    Guess someone convinced him that he will wind up being charged with perjury in nearly record time. He lies about easily verifiable things. He’d be screwed.

  • just_another_person@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    His team is obviously trying not to let him make more of an ass of himself. This is usually the turn in a trial where the defense starts sniffing out a deal, but I see zero chance of that being agreed upon by the protectors here. They know they’re destroying the defense and will refuse to compromise. I also doubt Trump’s narcissism would allow him to admit any kind of guilt.

  • Treczoks@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    7 months ago

    He’ll probably just hold a rally in front of the court and “recommend” his insurrection-loving fans to “visit” the court and “see for themselves how corrupt the court is” or something.

  • JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    7 months ago

    Just have some blog post about how much of a weakling, pussilanimous and pathetic loser he is for not testifying. I hear he likes that sort of stuff. All the tough guy stuff and he just folds over when it gets rough.

    I like my presidents with some spine, thanks.

  • PugJesus@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Shit-for-brains’ lawyers must have finally gotten it through his thick skull that the moron wouldn’t be able to help but incriminate himself in a host of other crimes if he testified.

  • cheese_greater@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Shocked! How does such a powerful and successfull defendant powerfully + successfully defend their indefensibles and unsuccesses

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    In an eleventh-hour reversal, former President Donald Trump announced Sunday he will not go back on the witness stand in the $250 million civil fraud trial against him and his company.

    Trump had been expected to tout his company’s success and push back on New York Attorney General Letitia James’ claims that he vastly overvalued his properties and his net worth in financial statements that he used to get favorable loans from banks that he otherwise would not have been entitled to.

    Called as a witness by James’ team on Nov. 6, a combative Trump made similar claims while also launching attacks on the AG and the judge who will decide the case, Arthur Engoron.

    “Eric has already testified, PERFECTLY,” Trump wrote, “so there is no reason to waste any more of this Crooked Court’s time on having him say the same thing, over and over again, as a witness for the defense.”

    Trump’s attorney Alina Habba told reporters after the former president appeared as a spectator at the trial on Thursday that he was “looking forward to taking the stand.”

    She said she had urged him not to testify again because of a gag order preventing him from criticizing the judge’s law clerk, who he had previously complained is biased against him.


    The original article contains 794 words, the summary contains 213 words. Saved 73%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • shalafi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    As I understand it, he never had to take the stand in the first place.

  • originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 months ago

    someone must have gotten it through his thick skull there would be no positive at best, and serious legal repercussions at worst. good on them, i hear thats damn near impossible.