Texas Gov. Greg Abbott has told a right-wing radio host that thereā€™s only one tool the state isnā€™t using to stop migrants from crossing the border into Texas: gun violence, because it would prompt a response from the pesky federal government.

ā€œThe only thing that we are not doing is weā€™re not shooting people who come across the borderā€”because, of course, the Biden administration would charge us with murder,ā€ the Republican governor toldĀ former NRA spokesperson Dana Loesch on her radio show last week.

      • Kairos@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        20
        Ā·
        6 months ago

        The US constitution? The President can do really anything they want within the law. Thereā€™s no really reason The President canā€™t arrest people.

        • prole@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          Ā·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          The President can do really anything they want within the law. Thereā€™s

          No they canā€™t. And arresting people is simply not in their purview.

    • Drivebyhaiku@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      Ā·
      6 months ago

      For folk in the States itā€™s a mix of the 4th, 5th and 14th Amendments of the Constitution with mostly individual state laws determining the validity of what constitutes an officer of the law and how a citizen arrest works as part of that individual Stateā€™s Criminal code.

      If youā€™re Canadian itā€™s federal law 494 of the Criminal Code.

      To be honest itā€™s really bloody difficult trying to accurately cite US law in discussion because States have a frankly ridiculous amount of binding power on their citizens which means there are 50+ laws about how exactly citizen versus peace officer arrest is handledā€¦ But most of them outline fairly specific limitations like it whether a citizenā€™s arrest can be applicable for misdemeanors, restrictions on what constitutes a reasonable use of force, rights of an arrested person, what constitutes a humane restriction of person and the requirement of validating the arrest with a judge within a certain time periodā€¦ You know Haebeous Corpus and all that.

      Bidenā€™s Presidential powers probably give him a lot of extra leeway against laws that would persecute him for doing an improper citizenā€™s arrest but that wouldnā€™t make an improper arrest stick any more than if you did it. A President is still legally a citizen and not a law enforcement officer.

    • prole@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      Ā·
      6 months ago

      Iā€™m sorry, do you think we need a law that says the President canā€™t personally arrest people?

      Yikesā€¦ Read a book.