Former President Donald Trump was recently warned against using his 2024 campaign funds to pay E. Jean Carroll, after being ordered to pay the former columnist stemming from a defamation lawsuit.

On Monday, Dave Aronberg, the state attorney in Florida’s Palm Beach County, appeared on MSNBC’s Morning Joe and spoke about the recent jury ruling in New York, which ordered Trump to pay Carroll $83.3 million for defamatory statements he made about her in 2019.

“He’s got to post a bond just to appeal within 30 days of the judgment. So E. Jean Carroll will get her money at some point,” Aronberg said. “He can try to get money from his supporters, but he’s got to tell them what it’s for…He can’t say, ‘Help me with my re-election fund’ and then divert the money to E. Jean Carroll, that would be a crime.”

Trump was previously ordered to pay Carroll $5 million after he was found liable for sexually assaulting the former Elle columnist in a Manhattan department store dressing room in the mid-1990s. Trump repeatedly denied the allegations, bashed Carroll and said she wasn’t his “type,” prompting the second lawsuit she brought against the former president.

  • Toastypickle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    95
    ·
    10 months ago

    He can’t say, ‘Help me with my re-election fund’ and then divert the money to E. Jean Carroll, that would be a crime."

    Fucking lol. As if something being a crime would ever stop him from doing it. What’s anyone going to do? Fine him? Rinse and repeat. The bullshit won’t end until the motherfucker is dead or in prison and only one of those things is ever going to happen.

  • dhork@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    10 months ago

    Someone told Donald Trump not to do a thing? He’s totally going to do that thing now, just to spite this random person, isn’t he?

      • dhork@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        10 months ago

        He is collecting criminal charges like they’re power-ups, though. It helps him build support.

      • Optional@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        10 months ago

        The jan 6 traitors already got six months. Can’t even do that for this demented rapist fraud.

        • Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          10 months ago

          Trump. He doesn’t want fair and speedy trials. His primary tactic is to delay until the other side just gives up. He may not be able to get the US government to “just give up” like he does with the contractors and lawyers he stiffs, but his tactics of indefinite delay still work like a charm.

    • OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      10 months ago

      The real trick is to put the real ask as a middle option so it looks more reasonable.

      $50 or $84,000,000 or $1 billion?

      Well $1 billion is way too much but maybe the next option down…

  • tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    10 months ago

    Wait I thought that John Oliver episode basically showed you could use super pac money for whatever the fuck you want. Is there some reason it doesn’t work like that for this?

    • Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      10 months ago

      Committing campaign finance violations is considered a serious crime when it happens. The thing is that you have to go so far out of your way to get anyone to notice or care that you might as well be on a different planet. Thing is, Trump already started off on a different planet and has been travelling further and further away ever since.

    • WeeSheep@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      I think you need to show that the money was spent on something sort of connected: A private jet to a spa day to make you look good for a debate. I’m not sure I necessarily understand it any better, but that was what I understand it to be.

        • BakerBagel
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          10 months ago

          But my fail son can control the funds and everything will be above board

          • OlinOfTheHillPeople@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            Garrett: "Well, as you know, with PACs like this, we’re not allowed to have direct contact with candidates…

            …I’m kidding! I’m Garrett Romney. Mitt’s my dad. But here’s the thing, Jack. My Brother-Dad, which is Mormon for “Dad”, has more money than he knows what to do with."

            Jack: “With all due respect, Garrett, I don’t think that’s a thing.”

  • Zoboomafoo@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Looks like “I didn’t know I couldn’t do that” Is out as a defense when he inevitably does that.

    That’s basically the cornerstone of their legal defense

  • Skyrmir@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    10 months ago

    Where is the betting pool on how long until he violates campaign law?

    Please respond soon, there’s not much time.