• fubo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    I’m fortunate to live in an area with good local independent news sources like Berkeleyside.

    National & international are a big mess. Better to look at lots of different sources. If the Wall Street Journal, Al-Jazeera, and The Grauniad all talk about an event, it probably happened.

  • chaorace@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    The Economist. Despite the insufferable name, it’s really quite good. It’s one of the only traditional publications that I actively pay for and read weekly.

    • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      Same here. Outside of if their Fuck Russia coverage (which isn’t unearned) or the viewpoint of a noble wanting to actually understand what is going on with the masses, it is pretty good.

  • richneptune@lemmy.fmhy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    BBC News. They do a fairly good job of being impartial since both main party voters here in the UK hate it and accuse it of being biased to the opposition!

  • MothBookkeeper@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    Here’s a chart that I’ve found really helpful. Predictably, it’s drawn some criticism, but in my experience, it’s been very accurate.

    • EnjoiNakMuay@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      Except they daily mail is well known as a heavily right leaning paper for years. So I wouldn’t take that images accuracy to heart

      • itchy_lizard@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Never heard of greyzone, but what you say is not true. Sorting by “Top” shows The Guardian, Reuters, Aljazeera, etc. The coverage is spread between many sources.

        • heartlessevil@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          You are overlooking the links that are obfuscated through archive.org and archive.ph. The default sort algorithm for that page on lemmygrad.ml is Active. Of the 40 links on that page, 7 are for rt.com and 2 are for grayzone. So 9/40 or 22.5% of the page is well-known propaganda and conspiracy theory outlets. I’m not even clicking through the links to the lesser-known outlets that are, in all likelihood, also conspiracy theorists and authoritarian propaganda.

          If you haven’t heard of grayzone I imagine you are still new to the tankieverse, so it isn’t too late for you to leave before becoming fully indoctrinated and delusional.

          • itchy_lizard@feddit.it
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 years ago

            lol it’s really not hard to learn information literacy. There are plenty of communists that appreciate leftist news but are not tankies.

  • Pumpkin@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    I don’t really read news in English anymore, but when I did, I subscribed to the economist. I found most other news sites were too biased and ignored most of the world.

  • Ace Lucario@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    If something’s important enough, I end up hearing it through people on discord. I don’t actively look for news.

  • shua_too
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    I get a weekly email from Ground.News and it’s been pretty interesting to see the distribution of sources covering various stories. I’ve never personally mused on the leanings of various sources but it passes the eye test I think, and it helps give a good aggregation of perspectives on a story.